before the Employees Provident Fund Appellate
Tribunal, Delhi (for short "EPFAT") under Section 7-I of the
Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous ... Provisions, Act in
the year 2015 itself but, subsequently, the EPFAT was abolished
and all the appeals pending before the EPFAT at Delhi were
transferred
petitioner herein invoked the jurisdiction of
Employees Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal (EPFAT). The EPFAT
vide order dated 13.07.2011 dismissed the appeal and inter alia held ... submitted that the order of the Regional Provident
Fund Commissioner and the EPFAT cannot be interfered with as the
same has been passed
vide
ATA No.871 (1) before the Employees Provident Fund Appellate
Tribunal (EPFAT), New Delhi. Thereafter, the said appeal was
transferred to EPFAT at Bangalore ... along with the said appeal.
There is no Presiding Officer in the EPFAT at Hyderabad. Therefore,
the petitioner herein is not in a position
Provident Fund Appellant Tribunal, New
Delhi and the case was transferred to EPFAT, Jabalpur and was registered as
EPFA No.4/17.
The reply
establishment along with the
entire assessed interest. Against the order
of the EPFAT, the petitioner filed
petition.
2.6 The said petition preferred under
Article
Section 7(1) of the Act. However, Rule 7 (2) of the EPFAT
Rules would postulate depositing of 75% of the awarded amount. In order
Bhucoalka Steel
Industries Ltd. vs. The Registrar, EPFAT, New Delhi)
and
4.2012(3) LLJ 736 (Kerala) (Attukal Bhagavathy
Temple Trust, Thiruvananthapuram).”
He pointed out that
Mandamus, calling for the
records of the First Respondent in Appeal No. EPFAT(B)/TN/47 of 2016 and
quash its order dated ... same. The Petitioner has challenged the order dated 20.07.2016 in Appeal No.
EPFAT(B)/TN/47 of 2016 passed by the Appellate Authority refusing
appeal ATA No.
727(13) 2015 filed by the petitioner before the EPFAT, New Delhi has
been renumbered as EPFA No.81/2018
quashing the (i) impugned order dated 29.07.2011
(Annexure P-20) passed by EPFAT (ii) impugned order dated 25.08.2009
passed by respondent No.2 (Annexure
