Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 783 (1.03 seconds)

Smt. Kaveri vs . Naveen & Ors. on 3 June, 2008

directed to pay Rs.20,000/- per month towards the maintenance, Rs.5,00,000/- towards compensation for treating the complainant with cruelty, to direct ... month to the complainant towards the ad-interim exparte maintenance u/s.23 of the Act, to restrain the respondents from alienating or disposing
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Himanshu Sharma vs Sadhna Sharma on 20 January, 2023

MONTH TO THE RESPONDENT, AS EX-PARTE, AD-INTERIM MAINTENANCE JUDGMENT: 1. The present appeal is preferred by Himanshu Sharma, (hereinafter referred ... ex-parte ad- interim maintenance to be granted to the complainant pending the adjudication of the application seeking interim maintenance. No one is present
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Exparte Judgment vs . on 24 March, 2014

Factory. Complainant has sought interim Smt. Roma Vs. Rajesh Kumar @ Mahipal & Ors. Page 3 of 7 Exparte Judgment maintenance @ Rs. 15,000/- per month ... after filing reply and after interim order dated 21.02.2013, due to which respondent no. 1 was treated as exparte on 01.10.2013 and respondent
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Unknown vs Geeta Etc on 20 August, 2007

submitted that ld trial court had passed an exparte order on 23.08.06 awarding interim maintenance @ Rs. 1,000/- per head to the two respondents ... service before the ld. trial court, he was proceeded as exparte and an interim maintenance @ Rs. 1,000/- per person per month was awarded
Delhi District Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harshit Gupta vs Aanchal Gupta on 4 May, 2023

appellant first and thereafter, deciding interim application of the respondent because interim maintenance can be granted even ex-parte as per section ... sources or correct sources are not disclosed. The objective of granting interim maintenance is to ensure that the dependant spouse is not reduced to destitution
Delhi District Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ritesh Grover vs Dipika Malhotra on 9 October, 2024

separate application for obtaining interim relief as provided under Section 23(1) DV Act. Accordingly, though no ex-parte ad interim orders can be passed ... behalf. Accordingly, impugned order dated 06.09.2022 is not an ex-parte interim maintenance order under Section 23(2) DV Act which required filing
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepika Malhotra vs Ritesh Grover on 9 October, 2024

separate application for obtaining interim relief as provided under Section 23(1) DV Act. Accordingly, though no ex-parte ad interim orders can be passed ... behalf. Accordingly, impugned order dated 06.09.2022 is not an ex-parte interim maintenance order under Section 23(2) DV Act which required filing
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next