Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 353 (1.02 seconds)

Smt. Tungamma vs Smt. Seethamma on 30 August, 2025

defendants/appellants who also raised a contention relating to extinction of easement under Sections 13 , 41 and 43 of the Indian Easements ... protect his easement. 56. To protect the easement, the owner of dominant heritage must establish that, (a) the easement conferred is of any extent
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Easements Act, 1977 (1920 A.D.)

imposes an easement on the land in favour of C, who enjoys the easement peaceably and openly as an easement without interruption for twenty- nine ... easement is an easement of necessity. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to an easement entitling the dominant owner to support
State of Jammu-Kashmir - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 0

The Indian Easements Act, 1882

imposes an easement on the land in favour of C, who enjoys the easement peaceably and openly as an easement without interruption for twenty-nine ... easement is an easement of necessity. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to an easement entitling the dominant owner to support
Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 1198

Mariamma Simon vs *Prasad on 13 November, 2024

observation of the learned District Judge about the extinction of easement by necessity once the dominant owner starts using the way which came into existence ... contained in Section 41 of the Indian Easements Act about the extinction of easement of necessity when the necessity comes to an end, the aforesaid
Kerala High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next