Appeal From Order No. 1020 of 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "FAFO-1") has been filed by defendant- Insurance Company under Section ... Appeal From Order No. 342 of 2015 (hereinafter referred to as "FAFO-2") has been filed by New India Assurance Company Limited
learned counsel appearing for the claimants-respondents No.1 and 2 in FAFO Nos.724, 725, 726 of 2011. None has appeared on behalf ... claimants-respondents in FAFO Nos.727 and 728 of 2011.
Since, in one accident, five persons lost their lives, it is in respect of their
Bharat Prasad 922 (Fafo)2009 vs U.P.Rajya Sadak Parivahan Nigam ... on 28 January, 2020
Author: Jaspreet Singh
Bench: Jaspreet Singh
HIGH COURT ... Case :- CROSS OBJECTION No. - 22 of 2009
Objector :- Bharat Prasad 922 (Fafo)2009
Respondent :- U.P.Rajya Sadak Parivahan Nigam Thorugh
Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Singh
Respondent :- National Insurance Co. Ltd. (Inre 521 Fafo 1999)
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukesh Singh
Hon'ble Anil Kumar ... view the aforesaid facts, which are evident from the record of the FAFO No. 521 of 99 particularly that without any notice to the review
India Insurance Co. Ltd. and others] has been challenged.
Appeal i.e. FAFO No. 254 of 2016 [Uday Pratap Singh ... modification of the judgment and award dated 24.12.2015. The appeal i.e. FAFO No. 293 of 2016 [The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Uday
accepted.
Compensation in MACP No.177 of 2007 giving rise to FAFO No. 734 of 2011 .
14. The submission of the counsel for the insurance ... compensation. The awarded amount is not disturbed.
15. As far as the FAFO No.2473 of 2009 and FAFO No. 2538 of 2019 are concerned
learned counsel for the respondent no.1 Nirmala Devi Jaiswal in FAFO No.5 of 2020.
None has put in appearance on behalf ... respondent in FAFO No.17 of 2010.
The above two appeals i.e. FAFO No.5 and FAFO No.10 arise out of an common
judgment and award dated 13.9.1996 which is impugned in both the appeals.
FAFO No. 860 of 1996 was filed by the claimant for enhancement ... become unfit for any job and there is 100% loss of earning.
FAFO No. 3375 of 2009(Old Defective No. 56 of 1997) has been
against such an order of remand, only FAFO would lie before the Board of Revenue and for the said proposition of law, learned counsel ... Second Appeal would lie against such an order, but only an FAFO could have been entertained by the Board of Revenue.
39. It has further
trial court on 17.8.2017 was assailed before this Court in FAFO No. 306 of 2017. The FAFO filed by the Bank was allowed ... court again for decision of the civil suit on merit.
The present FAFO under Section 104 read with Order XLIII Rule
