same survey No.9/1/H through the same Firman.
However, the petitioners have suppressed the said fact. Learned
Senior counsel further contended that there ... Hussain Khan and Fasiuddin Khan
and they are claiming the rights through Firman dated
30.05.1961.
4. Whether the impugned order passed by respondent
same survey No.9/1/H through the same Firman.
However, the petitioners have suppressed the said fact. Learned
Senior counsel further contended that there ... Hussain Khan and Fasiuddin Khan
and they are claiming the rights through Firman dated
30.05.1961.
4. Whether the impugned order passed by respondent
same survey No.9/1/H through the same Firman.
However, the petitioners have suppressed the said fact. Learned
Senior counsel further contended that there ... Hussain Khan and Fasiuddin Khan
and they are claiming the rights through Firman dated
30.05.1961.
4. Whether the impugned order passed by respondent
same survey No.9/1/H through the same Firman.
However, the petitioners have suppressed the said fact. Learned
Senior counsel further contended that there ... Hussain Khan and Fasiuddin Khan
and they are claiming the rights through Firman dated
30.05.1961.
4. Whether the impugned order passed by respondent
guntas. It was also stated before the HRC
that a Firman was issued by the then Nizam, the erstwhile
Ruler, on 18th Rajjab 1343 Hijri ... virtue of the Firman
issued by the Nizam, they are the titleholders of the property.
The HRC after hearing the parties, has passed the impugned
guntas. It was also stated before the HRC
that a Firman was issued by the then Nizam, the erstwhile
Ruler, on 18th Rajjab 1343 Hijri ... virtue of the Firman
issued by the Nizam, they are the titleholders of the property.
The HRC after hearing the parties, has passed the impugned
guntas. It was also stated before the HRC
that a Firman was issued by the then Nizam, the erstwhile
Ruler, on 18th Rajjab 1343 Hijri ... virtue of the Firman
issued by the Nizam, they are the titleholders of the property.
The HRC after hearing the parties, has passed the impugned
documents relating to inheritance of the property through Sanad and
the Firmans issued by the Nizam recognizing the ownership over the
property and the order ... continued general after generation from the year 1289
Fasli".
The Firman dt. 17.01.1929, the relevant true extract is as under:-
"The heirs
documents relating to inheritance of the property through Sanad and
the Firmans issued by the Nizam recognizing the ownership over the
property and the order ... continued general after generation from the year 1289
Fasli".
The Firman dt. 17.01.1929, the relevant true extract is as under:-
"The heirs
guntas. It was also stated before the HRC
that a Firman was issued by the then Nizam, the erstwhile
Ruler, on 18th Rajjab 1343 Hijri ... virtue of the Firman
issued by the Nizam, they are the titleholders of the property.
The HRC after hearing the parties, has passed the impugned
