Search Results Page

Search Results

61 - 70 of 1093 (1.49 seconds)

Ashok Kumar vs United India Insu.Co. on 24 November, 2015

complaint before Forum stating that since the appellant was operated for Fistula and the Fistula in Ano is not covered under the policy condition ... deficiency in service in repudiating the claim as the disease i.e. Fistula for which the appellant was operated, is not covered under the condition
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dr.Omprakash Singh, Mbbs., Md., And ... vs Kadurka Lakshmaiah Nizamabad. on 16 June, 2009

complainant paid Rs.2000/- and during the postoperative period complainant developed enteric fistula and pulmonary tuberculosis and while opening the stitches on 20.11.1993 blood ... treatment for anti tuberculosis and later was operated twice for closure of fistula and was finally discharged on 17.9.1995 with instruction to continue medicines life
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Kamoo @ Kiran Etc. on 8 March, 2007

bleeding per vagina and passing stools per vagina. On examination, recto vaginal fistula 2 x 3 cms was detected, 1 cm. above anal sphincter with ... fetus was found viable and thereafter the repair of the fistula was conducted on 22.1.00 and she was discharged. 24. PW8 further deposed that
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suparna Debnath & Anr vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 18 February, 2019

suggests possibility of gastrointestinal malformation (esophageal artesia with or without tracheo- esophageal fistula) which is amenable to surgical correction, though the baby will have prolonged ... possibility of gastrointestinal malformation (esophageal artesia with or without 5 trachea-esophageal fistula). The report has also suggested that the baby will have a prolonged
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 13 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
Previous   3 4 5 6 7   8 9 10 11 12 Next