submitted that the
writ-applicant is officer of a State Transmission Utility GETCO
under Section 39 of Electricity Act 2003 here in after referred ... petitions. Since respondent in present writ-applicants have
obstructed petitioner officer of GETCO approached District
Magistrate Banaskantha for his permission as envisaged in
Section
Hasurkar, the learned advocate placed reliance on
copy of Notification declaring GETCO as State Transmission
Utility which is approved by the Government under Section ... decision in
the case of Himmatbahi Patel V/s Deputy Engineer GETCO,
reported in 2011 GLH 781 and Power Grid Corporation v/s
Page
said Windmill
would generate electricity. The Gujarat Energy Transmission
Company Ltd., ('GETCO' for short) has a sub-station at Wind
Farm. The electricity ... generated would be duly supplied to
the GETCO and for that purpose one agency known as Gujarat
Energy Development Agency ('GEDA' for short
herein
addressed a letter to the Executive Engineer, Division Office,
GETCO, Morbi and informed that they are not giving
permission for erection of the line ... Hasurkar, the learned advocate relied on the
notification declaring Gujarat Energy Transmission (GETCO) as
State Transmission Utility (STU) which is duly produced
said Windmill
would generate electricity. The Gujarat Energy Transmission
Company Ltd., ('GETCO' for short) has a sub-station at Wind
Farm. The electricity ... generated would be duly supplied to
the GETCO and for that purpose one agency known as Gujarat
Energy Development Agency ('GEDA' for short
respondent
no.2- Deputy Collector & Sub Divisional Magistrate, Veraval in
GETCO case. 01 of 2023 (At annexure; K);
(B) During the pendency and final ... respondent no.2- Deputy Collector &
Sub Divisional Magistrate, Veraval in GETCO case. 01 of 2023
(At annexure; K) and further be pleased to direct
setting
aside the decision of the Respondent No.3 - Executive
Engineer (Const.), GETCO, Mehsana dated 26.08.2022 and
further be pleased to direct the Respondent - Electricity ... communication dated 23.08.2022, the
Public Information Officer, GETCO communicated to the
Public Information Officer of Executive Engineer (Const.),
GETCO, Mehsana, wherein, it was asked
electrical
line from the plant site to the interface point at the GETCO
Substation etc. shall be entirely at the cost of the applicant
Himmatbhai Patel V/s Chief Engineers
project GETCO, paragraphs : 29, 32, 33, 49 and 52
Page 18 of 35
Downloaded ... 12223/2021 JUDGMENT DATED: 10/06/2022
(b) GETCO v/s Ratilal Maganji Barot. Letters Patent Appeal
No.534 of 2020 decided on 6.11.2020, paragraphs
apply only to Government owned electricity
distribution or transmission company (GETCO or PGVCL in this
case). When any person raises objection, then GETCO or PGVCL
