contributed, the same being utilized in
creation of the fixed assets without GETCO being entitled to any return
on investment or interest actually or notionally ... deferred income and
correspondingly no depreciation need to be paid to GETCO. The State
Commission ought not to have considered the deferred income
Anushka Arora for R-1
Mr. Ishan Mukherjee
Ms. Venu for GETCO
Ms. Swapna Srivastava
Ms. Nishtha Sikroria
Ms. Poorva Saigal
Appeal ... Gujarat
Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. (GUVNL) and Gujarat Energy Transmission
Corporation Ltd., (GETCO), under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003
against the Order dated
demand made by the Executive
Engineer, Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd. ("GETCO")
for allotment of the land ad-measuring 190052 square meters from ... petitioner sent its objections stating that since huge land is
demanded by GETCO from its Gauchar land (the land meant for cattle
grazing), the gauchar
Pravin Chhotalal Mangi vs Getco (Formerly As Gujarat Electricity ... on 4 April, 2016
Author: J.B.Pardiwala
Bench: J.B.Pardiwala
C/CA/2829/2016 ... CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1424 of 2003
==========================================================
PRAVIN CHHOTALAL MANGI....Applicant(s)
Versus
GETCO (FORMERLY AS GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD) &
4....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NIRAV
Padhiyar Kusumben Bharatbhai & vs Engineer Getco Company & 6 on 16 December, 2016
Author: S.H.Vora
Bench: S.H.Vora
C/SCA/20950 ... PADHIYAR KUSUMBEN BHARATBHAI & 11....Petitioner(s)
Versus
ENGINEER GETCO COMPANY & 6....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. EKRAMA H QURESHI, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner
Chhatrasinh Tapubha Jadega vs The Superintending Engineer(Getco) & 2 on 19 September, 2016
Author: C.L.Soni
Bench: C.L. Soni
C/CA/9030 ... CHHATRASINH TAPUBHA JADEGA....Applicant(s)
Versus
THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER(GETCO) & 2....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
JEET Y RAJYAGURU, ADVOCATE for the Applicant
Chhatrasinh Tapubha Jadega vs The Superintending Engineer(Getco) & 2 on 12 January, 2016
Author: Paresh Upadhyay
Bench: Paresh Upadhyay
C/SCA/408/2016 ORDER ... CHHATRASINH TAPUBHA JADEGA....Petitioner(s)
Versus
THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER(GETCO) & 2....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR JEET Y RAJYAGURU, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner
Government Policy/Law, and (ii) Non availability of evacuation
facility by GETCO.
The above facts reflect that the delay in commissioning of the
project ... government rules
regarding land acquisition and partially due to failure of
GETCO in providing transmission line within stipulated period.
Both these reasons were beyond
third party.
(iv)The Power Producer shall seek approval
of GETCO in respect of interconnection
Facilties.
(v) The Power Producer shall approach GETCO
for laying ... transmission line from it
switchyard to nearest substation of GETCO.
Further, Power Producer shall ensure the
injection of power at not lower than
grant to DISCOMs for the FY 2009-10.
As regards to GETCO, they have incurred capital expenditure of Rs.650 crores
upto January ... stations of Rs.151 crore (RE) is
specifically meant for GETCO. In addition for creation of new Sub-Stations in
coastal areas under Sagarkhedu Yojana
