state that, the Sy.No.145 of Hulsogi
village is 'Gomal land' and it cannot be regularized.
After receipt of the application seeking ... classification, it has been found that, the land
in question is 'Gomal' land and the land available for
grazing in the said village
that we are not going to grant
any Govt. Lands i.e., Gomal, Gayaran, and
HulluBani, against the Circular dated 24.12.2005 to
any Person ... land in Raichur district,
including those lands that are reserved for gomal.
03. Further, I submit that in view of non-
availability of land
Munekolalu Village, Varathur Hobli, Bengaluru was a
Government Gomal land. The Government of Karnataka
with the object of providing free house sites to the
economically ... Munekolalu Village, Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru. These
lands were set apart as gomal vide orders dated
12.03.1938. This document was issued on 02.12.1988
by the Tahsildar
purposes of regularisation of unauthorised occupation
and reduction of the gomal beyond the extent permissible in
law in certain cases. At Serial ... Deputy Commissioner to further relax the
provision and reduce the extent of gomal. Learned counsel
submits that this circular has not been looked into
T John vs State Of Karnataka on 17 February, 2026
Author: Suraj Govindaraj
Bench: Suraj
bearing Sy.No.56 was totally
measuring 30 acres and it was gomal land and on
06.07.1963, the schedule land to the extent
their common intention, had been to
survey No.62 of Government Gomal land at B. Shettihalli and
when the complainant questioned with regard to ploughing ... their common intention, had been to survey
No.62 of Government Gomal land at B. Shettihalli. When the
complainant questioned with regard to ploughing
impugned notice, it is stated that the petitioners have
unauthorisedly occupied government gomal lands in Sy.No.28
(Udafe No.60) of Kotnatevaru Village, Channarayapatna ... decision that the petitioners have
unauthorisedly occupied a portion of the government gomal
lands, which is not correct. The petitioners are leaseholders in
terms
Annexure-J dated 25.04.2025 stating that the lands in
question are gomal lands and therefore, the name of the
petitioner cannot be mutated ... Tahsildar, it is clear that the
lands in question are gomal lands and there is no valid
Annexure-J dated 25.04.2025 stating that the lands in question
are gomal lands and therefore, the name of the petitioner
cannot be mutated ... Tahsildar, it is
clear that the lands in question are gomal lands and there is no
valid grant made in favour of any person. However
