land, in dispute, might have been recorded as shamilat
deh hasab rasad zare khewat prior to 1953, but with
enactment of the Punjab Village Common ... once again records that the
land is "Shamilat Deh Hasab Rasad Zare Khewat" but in possession
of certain proprietors as "Gair Marausi
Jumla Mustarka Malkan Hasab Rasad Zar ... vs Union Territory on 30 March, 2009
Author: Rakesh Kumar Jain
Bench: Rakesh Kumar Jain
IN THE HIGH COURT ... 1493 of 2003
Date of Decision: 30.3.2009
Jumla Mustarka Malkan Hasab Rasad Zar Khewat Village Jhumru
through Mohan Singh and others
..Appellants.
Vs.
Union Territory
Chandigarh vs Shamlat Deh Hasab Rasad Khewat And ... on 30 March, 2009
Author: Rakesh Kumar Jain
Bench: Rakesh Kumar Jain
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Date of Decision: 30.3.2009
UT Chandigarh
..Appellant
Vs.
Shamlat Deh Hasab Rasad Khewat and others
..Respondent(s).
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR
when in the jamabandis
concerned, there occurs only an entry of Hasab Rasad Khewat, but yet
when there is also a further entry existing ... existence in the revenue records, of an entry of Hasab Rasad
Khewat. Nonetheless, they submit, that when contradistinct to the
above entry, as carried
when in the jamabandis concerned, there
occurs only an entry of Hasab Rasad Khewat, but yet when there is also a
further entry existing ... existence in the revenue records, of an entry of Hasab
Rasad Khewat. Nonetheless, they submit, that when contradistinct to the
above entry, as carried
when in the jamabandis concerned, there
occurs only an entry of Hasab Rasad Khewat, but yet when there is also a
further entry existing ... existence in the revenue records, of an entry of Hasab
Rasad Khewat. Nonetheless, they submit, that when contradistinct to the
above entry, as carried
Khatauni Pamaish for
the year 1951-52 (P1), 'Shamlat Deh Hasab Rasad Arazi Khewat' is
recorded as owner in the column of ownership ... from Gram Panchayat in favour of
'Shamlat Deh Hasab Rasad Zar Khewat'. Besides, mutation No.117 was
entered from 'Shamlat Deh Hasab
Khewatdars of the village are recorded as Jumla Malkan
Deegar Haqdaran Hasab Rasad Rakba Khewat, whereas, in the
cultivation column, their possession as cultivators ... Khewatdars of the village are recorded
as Jumla Malkan Deegar Haqdaran Hasab Rasad Rakba Khewat,
whereas, in the cultivation column, their possession as cultivators
column of ownership is recorded as 'Shamlat Deh Hasab Rasad
Khewat' and is in the occupation of the petitioner. It is recorded ... recorded
in the column of ownership as 'Shamlat Deh Hasab Rasad Khewat'.
Besides, the petitioner is recorded in possession of the said land
erred in holding that as the land is "Shamilat
Deh Hasab Rasad Zare Khewat", it cannot be termed as "Shamilat ... submitted that the words "Shamilat Deh" and not "Hasab
Rasad Zare Khewat", denote the common land of a village. The
words
