Section 66A in The Information Technology Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
other electronic record, which may be transmitted with the message. Held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Shreya Singhal v Union of India
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 48683 (7.66 seconds)Section 303 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
person serving a life term in another case. It was held unconstitutional in Mithu v. State of Punjab. The Supreme Court explained that the punishment ... imprisonment committed murder, they would mandatorily be sentenced to death. The SC held that the provision drew an arbitrary distinction between persons committing murder
Misrilal Jain Etc. Etc vs State Of Orissa & Another on 2 May, 1977
collected under the Act of 1962 which was
held unconstitutional, having been refused by the Govern-
ment, they filed writ petitions in the Orissa High ... pursued for the reason
that the two Acts were held unconstitutional, the authority
concerned can pass appropriate orders reviving the
appeal.[719 D-F]
Observation
Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka By Secretary, ... on 28 February, 2003
invalid, since enactments i.e., Act 29 of 79 was
held unconstitutional and still born in Sri Kudli Shringeri Maha
Samsthana v. State ... which it was given the power to exercise that jurisdiction was held unconstitutional. Thus, the
Orders passed by the De-facto Court/Tribunal, the creation
Khambalia Municilpality & Anr vs State Of Gujarat on 16 February, 1967
what it cannot do directly. But S. 9(1) at be held
unconstitutional because of the possibility that it may be
unfaithfully administered by those ... action will be struck down.
But s. 9(1) cannot be held unconstitutional bemuse of the
possibility that it may be unfaithfully administered by
those
Kumari Anjana Mishra And Anr. vs Principal, K.M. Rustogi, M.L.B. ... on 10 November, 1989
outside-State students") in Medical Colleges arbitrary choice was held unconstitutional. In Sanjay Gulati, AIR 1983 SC 580 equities were adjusted between students wrongly ... College) to the exclusion of meritorious candidates was held unconstitutional and the prohibitory rule framed by the University was struck down. The decision
Alliance Association Ltd. vs M/S. Sagwamal Kishan Lal on 4 July, 2012
Delhi Rent Control Act having been held unconstitutional, Section 50
of the Act to the extent it bars jurisdiction of civil court to entertain ... Delhi Rent Control Act having been held unconstitutional by a Division
Bench of this Court, there is no statutory backing for a unilateral increase
Jagmohan Lal Varma vs Textile Commissioner And Ors. on 15 December, 1978
Order and in the event of the latter being held unconstitutional, the former shall stand rendered out of context and inoperative because ... would be rendered ineffective in the event of the latter being held unconstitutional. He has, however, urged that the assumption raised is fallacious
The State Of Bihar vs Maharajadhiraja Sir Kameshwar Singhof ... on 27 May, 1952
value cannot be held to be for a
public purpose and sec. 4 clause (b) of the Act is therefore
unconstitutional and void. Per MUKHERJEA ... will be recalled that the High Court of Patna held the Bihar
Act unconstitutional as being discriminatory in providing
for payment of compensation
Mafatlal Industries Ltd. And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 19 December, 1996
mistake (see State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bhailal Bhai )". The Court held that "it was the duty of the State to investigate ... imposed upon the tobacco imported by the respondents was held to be unconstitutional on the ground that it was violative of Article