everyday the petitioner has been produced. We also believe that the High Court proceeded on the footing that production of the petitioner in different courts ... that the Government of India has demonetized the currency notes of 500 and 1000 denominations, does not render the act of the petitioner complained
everyday the petitioner has been produced. We also believe that the High Court proceeded on the footing that production of the petitioner in different courts ... that the Government of India has demonetized the currency notes of 500 and 1000 denominations, does not render the act of the petitioner complained
everyday the petitioner has been produced. We also believe that the High Court proceeded on the footing that production of the petitioner in different courts ... that the Government of India has demonetized the currency notes of 500 and 1000 denominations, does not render the act of the petitioner complained
consequently direct the 1st respondent to accept the Specified Bank Notes of the denomination Rs.1000x400 and Rs.500x400= Rs.6,00,000/- received ... notes in the following denominations, viz.,
Rs.1000x400 = Rs.4,00,000/-
Rs. 500x400 = Rs.2,00,000/-
-------------------
Total = Rs.6,00,000/-
-------------------
3. Heard
Bench: A.Selvam , P.Kalaiyarasan
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 24.02.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM
and
THE HONOURABLE ... issuance of a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the bank
notes of the denomination value of Rs.2,000/- is not valid.
For Petitioner
The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs Saravana Pandian on 28 March, 2017
Author: S.S
Shevapet Sowrashtra Vidhyalaya Sabai ... vs Sri Panduranganadhaswami Devasthanam on 7 February, 2017
Author: R.Subramanian
Singapore Airlines Cargo Pvt Ltd vs M/S. Hcl Info Systems Ltd on 19 June
Thiru. K.S.S.V.P.Murthy Raju vs State on 15 May, 2017
Author
Dhayanandhan @ Dhayalan (Died) vs State Rep. By on 11 August, 2017
Author: S.Baskaran
Bench
