18948 of 2016.
Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate,
for respondent-HSMITC.
Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate
for the respondent ... grant the past service
benefits rendered by the petitioners in the respondent HSMITC towards
pension and other retiral benefits along with arrears of pension with
them in Haryana State Minor Irrigation
Tubewell Coproration Limited (for brevity 'HSMITC') for the purpose of
retiral benefits.
Initially, petitioners were recruited ... HSMITC, which was
under the exclusive control of Government of Haryana. The service
rendered by petitioner in HSMITC has been mentioned in para
certiorari/mandamus directing the
respondents for counting the previous service rendered in
HSMITC in terms of judgment CWP No.20670 of 2010;
Subhash Chander
considered opinion that facts which are not disputed are that
HSMITC, assigned lining work of water course to the
plaintiff. It is also not disputed ... plaintiff. Admittedly, the completion of additional work same
is being enjoyed by HSMITC. Hon'ble Supreme Court in State
of J&K Versus
pension and
other due benefits by counting their past service rendered with HSMITC with
interest @ 18% per annum in terms of judgments dated 14.01.2016
(Annexures
petitioner has claimed that the service
which he had rendered with HSMITC from 01.12.1981 to 04.10.2011 be
counted as a qualifying service for the purpose
Saurabh Mago, AAG, Haryana for the State.
Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for HSMITC.
****
Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral)
For the reasons recorded in judgment of even
respondents No.2 & 3.
Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate,
for respondent-HSMITC.
****
Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral)
For the reasons recorded in judgment of even date
Mago, AAG, Haryana for the State.
Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate,
for respondent-HSMITC.
****
Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral)
For the reasons recorded in judgment of even
Mago, AAG, Haryana for the State.
Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate,
for respondent-HSMITC.
****
Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral)
For the reasons recorded in judgment of even
