Ayyasamy , (2001) 7 SCC 503 4
d. Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin , (2012) 8 SCC 148
3.7. Section 107 read with Order XLI Rule ... Appellant has misconceived and sought to misapply the
decision in Ibrahim Uddin (supra). There is contextual
misapplication as the said decision pertains to a private
judgement of
the Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Ibrahim Uddin &Anr ,
reported in (2012) 8 SCC 148, it held that when ... plaintiff also
relies on the judgement of the Supreme Court in Ibrahim Uddin (supra)
wherein it was held that when a Court issues a direction
heavy reliance is placed on decision in
Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin.2
13. This brings us to CM APPL. 6107/2019, which ... aforesaid applications in view of decision in the case of Ibrahim
Uddin (supra), it would be expedient to reproduce provisions of Order
XLI Rule
Kerala & Anr. , AIR 2006 SC
3366; Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin & Anr. , (2012) 8 SCC 148.
11. Since the contentions relate ... burden shifted upon the complainant which he
failed to discharge. Ibrahim Uddin (supra), was relied upon by the
learned counsel for the respondent primarily
Dictionary, Eight Edition).
The Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Ibrahim Uddin (2012) 8 SCC
148 cited with approval Bibhabati Devi Vs. Ramendra Narayan
respondent. Reliance is placed on Union of India v.
Ibrahim Uddin (2012) 8 SCC 148, The Court held that the Court
cannot travel beyond
Surjanarayan Dass AIR 1967 SC 256; Union of
India Vs. Ibrahim Uddin & Anr. (2012) 8 SCC 148; Satyawati Sharma Vs.
Union of India
Union of India vs. Ibrahim Uddin and Anr., (2012) 8 SCC 148.
RFA 950/2016 Page 8 of 10
16. In the case in hand
India Tourism Development Corporation ... vs Miss Susan Leigh Beer on 30 May, 2014
Equivalent citations
Haji Latif AIR 1968 SC 1413 and Union
of India Vs. Ibrahim Uddin (2012) 8 SCC 148.
41. The defendant/Counter Claimant, inspite of opportunity
