Dodballapur Integrated Textile Park ... vs Mrs Premalatha G Jain on 16 March, 2023
Author: M
respondent eventually initiated arbitration
making claims. The Arbitrator was appointed under ICADR
Rules and Arbitration proceedings were conducted in
Arbitration Case No.56/2017
clearly
contrary to the provisions of the Rules governing
the appointment of Arbitrators by ICADR, which the
parties had agreed to abide in the matter
clearly contrary to the
provisions of the Rules governing the appointment of
Arbitrators by ICADR, which the parties had agreed to
abide in the matter
clearly
contrary to the provisions of the Rules governing
the appointment of Arbitrators by ICADR, which
the parties had agreed to abide in the matter
clearly contrary to the
provisions of the Rules governing the appointment of
Arbitrators by ICADR, which the parties had agreed to
abide in the matter
Tiles and Ors.,
18/32
provisions of the Rules governing the
appointment of Arbitrators by ICADR, which
the parties had agreed to abide
sight
of. In Antrix (supra), appointment of the Arbitrator, as
per ICC Rules, was as per the alternative procedure
14
agreed upon, whereas in Pricol ... clearly contrary to the
provisions of the Rules governing the appointment of
Arbitrators by ICADR, which the parties had agreed
to abide in the matter
clearly
contrary to the provisions of the Rules governing
the appointment of Arbitrators by ICADR, which
the parties had agreed to abide in the matter
ICADR BUILDING, PLOT NO.6,
VASANTH KUNJ INSTITUTIONAL AREA,
PHASE II NEW DELHI-110 070.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE