matrimonial home in the year 2004.
The first petitioner filed IDOP No.55 of 2004 on the file of the
District Court, Chengalpattu and obtained ... have been made with regard to the service
of notice in the IDOP as well as GWOP.
7.The learned Senior counsel for the respondent
dated 12.11.2010, copy of the petition and order in IDOP No.6 of 2010 and Ex.R3 dated 30.03.2010, Exparte order in IDOP ... just cause and in order to have a peaceful life, he filed IDOP No.6 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judge, Family
dated 12.11.2010, copy of the petition and order in IDOP No.6 of 2010 and Ex.R3 dated 30.03.2010, Exparte order in IDOP ... just cause and in order to have a peaceful life, he filed IDOP No.6 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judge, Family
since 2013 and based on the said statement, the
petitioner has filed IDOP.No.4801 of 2018 on the file of the V-
Additional Family ... ground of adultery. He
further submitted that after service of notice in IDOP, the
respondent herein entered appearance and filed counter and
thereafter, she filed
judis
5
5.In the meantime, the husband also filed IDOP
No.316 of 2018 before the Family Court, seeking divorce.
The maintenance petition, that ... spite of his
warning, that was not discontinued. Seeking divorce, IDOP
No.316 of 2018 has been filed by the husband and it was
dismissed
grant permission to Mr.Manu, to represent in the above IDOP., on his behalf. The learned 2nd Additional Family Court Judge, by an order, dated
dispute that the revision petitioner
has filed a petition in IDOP.No.146 of 2008 before the District Court, Erode,
against the first respondent, claiming ... rightly observed that the revision petitioner in the divorce
proceedings in IDOP No.146 of 2008 has specifically admitted that due to their
wed-lock
will be
indirectly defeating the maintenance order. Therefore, the filing of IDOP by
the revision petitioner for restitution of conjugal rights cannot erase the
interim
will be
indirectly defeating the maintenance order. Therefore, the filing of IDOP by
the revision petitioner for restitution of conjugal rights cannot erase the
interim
FCMC No.17 of 2018,
FCIDOP No.16 of 2019 and IDOP No.212 of 2019 now renumbered as
FCIDOP
