found in the well.
The prosecution as alleged that petitioner has illicit
relation with the wife of third son of the informant. It is alleged ... hinges on circumstantial
evidence and only circumstance is that petitioner has illicit relation
with the wife of third son of the informant. It is also
dated 05.01.2012 has stated that the husband of the victim had illicit
relation with Punam Devi.
Learned counsel for the State submits that the First
years ago. It is
further alleged that petitioner had illicit relation with his Bhabhi
and for the reason the victim was done to death
evident from the case diary
that petitioner had illicit relation with the deceased.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
probability of possession ... mobile due to illicit
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21506 of 2012 (2) dt.19-06-2012
relation with the petitioner. However, except this
loose character and father-in-law of the
informant has illicit relation with one of the daughter-in-law and
husband of the informant ... tension due to illicit relation of
her father-in-law so they were killed the husband of the informant.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc
Code.
There is only allegation against the petitioner that she
has illicit relation with the husband of the informant and she used
to instigate
alleged that husband of the
deceased running a school and has illicit relation with one
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27181
petitioner refused to keep her
and alleged that the complainant has illicit relation with other
so he filed a case for divorce.
Learned counsel
supervision note has stated that wife of Taslim Mian
having illicit relation and wife of Taslim Mian has not named this
petitioner and petitioner remained
case diary it is stated that Kamal
Kishore has illicit relation with the daughter of the informant
Pushpa Kumari.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits
