quziliiiy ef the evidence adduced by i.he.
parties. 11 is quite ime that as observed by l,O1'Cl.4Dll.'_! ~.'
Pareq ... bequeath in favottr of lV~del'enclant[ for two t'.imes. it is e1Is(3'"stz1t'.ed
that the sons
1eiv_~}H;e:*
the heruse of accused. At th_a t.c:ime, 'firsi?'xec:a:seii'xvas V
present
ime €3§",i}.3}i§§3..§ aypsaég V
12% Thai '£1323 cigaiéfizigmé '£§i'}.E?
juzigmezzi
inxreséigaiion under 3€€:£i<::n 156(3) L"
the large: ime:"es§ {>5 {the Smta ané
A B Shetty Memorial Institute Of Dental ... vs Fee Fixation Committee on 9 November, 2009
State By Sakaleshapura Rural Police ... vs Dharma @ Dharmesha S/O Byraiah on 5 October, 2012
eaaci ti-c ime
sflaflia
house of
accused to take lunch,
At the t.ime of incident, PW 3 was not going to school,
She used to stay
Claimants and first respondent: Fhis application was
filed on 29.10.2007 by whieh, ime first respondent had
not filed written statement, ever as per entries made
person on his behalf, is
in possession or has, at any 'ime during the
period ¢ or his office, been in vossession for
which
