Ramchandra vs Tukaram And Ors on 24 August, 1965
imposing a restriction on the determination of all
tenancies, it would imply grant of projection to a
contumacious tenant as well. The Legislature could
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 109 (1.45 seconds)The Central Bank Of India Ltd vs P.S. Rajagopalan Etc on 19 April, 1963
Maxwell has observed "where an Act confers a
jurisdiction, it impliedly also grants the power of doing
all such acts, or employing such means
Messrs. Ispahani Ltd. Calcutta vs Ispahani Employees Union on 6 May, 1959
down in that case for
inferring that there was an implied agreement for grant of
such a bonus are correct and it is necessary that ... inference in
law can be drawn that an implied term of employment for
grant of puja bonus has been established. The Appellate
Tribunal therefore
The Management Of Hotel Imperial, New ... vs Hotel Workers' Union on 21 May, 1959
grant of interim relief in these cases is concerned. Even
though there may be an implied term giving power to the
employer to suspend ... under the Act. The existence of
such an implied term cannot bar the tribunal from granting
interim relief if it has the power
Raje Anandrao vs Shamrao And Others on 23 February, 1961
manager or the agent of Raje Anandrao, will
have power to grant leave to, or fine, or
punish the pujaris for misconduct ... pujaris in the discharge of
their duties
944
implies that be is the person to grant them leave or fine%
or punish them for misconduct
Kishan Chand Arora vs Commissioner Of Police, Calcutta on 9 December, 1960
ground that it conferred
arbitrary and unguided powers on the Commissioner to grant
or refuse a license without hearing the applicant and was,
therefore ... unqualified discretion on the Commissioner to grant
a licence. A discretionary power to issue a licence
necessarily implies a power to refuse to issue
Godawari S. Parulekar And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 January, 1966
word is generally used,
does not imply a parting with powers by the
person who grants the delegation, but points
rather to the conferring
Aluru Kondayya And Ors vs Singaraju Rama Rao And Ors on 20 September, 1965
prescription or by the doctrine of lost grant
the rights of permanent occupancy; and
(3)that the grant was of an estate within
the meaning ... minor inams not comprised in the
grant were created contemporaneously with or subsequent to
the grant of the village by the original grantor : see
Janakiramaraju
K. P. Chowdhary vs State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors on 15 March, 1966
case of an
implied contract resulting from the appellant's accepting
the conditions of auction and that such an implied contract ... contracts which are required to be reduced to
writing and an implied contract in its very nature was not
such a contract. Finally the full
Sri Rama Vilas Service (P) Ltd vs C. Chandrasekaran & Ors on 9 December, 1963
granting of a monopoly
to a bus-operator may be prejudicial to public interest,
becomes irrelevant only because it has been included or is
implied ... granting of a monopoly to a bus-operator may be prejudicial
to public interest, becomes irrelevant only because it has
been included or is implied