bear in mind certain general principles with regard to an implied repeal by the Legislature of an earlier legislation by a subsequent legislation. The Prevention ... most that cam be said is that there is an implied repeal. The Court never looks with favour upon the suggestion that there
A.R. Antulay vs R.S. Nayak & Anr on 29 April, 1988
Equivalent citations
Maru Ram Etc. Etc vs Union Of Lndia & Anr on 11 November, 1980
Equivalent
Otherwise, the later law must prevail or implied repeal may be inferred. We may not be compelled to explore these ramifications here since the Remission ... case
20. We cannot agree with counsel that the non obstante provision impliedly sustains. It is elementary that a non obstante tail should
Criminal Procedure, 1898 (which corresponds to present Section 125) stands impliedly repealed by S. 4 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance
Criminal Procedure, 1898 (which corresponds to present Section 125) stands impliedly repealed by Section 4 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance
Bachan Singh Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab Etc. Etc on 16 August, 1982
Equivalent
Kathi Raning Rawat vs The State Of Saurashtra on 27 February, 1952
Equivalent citations: 1952
Bachan Singh vs State Of Punjab on 9 May, 1980
Equivalent citations: (1982)3SCC24, [1983
Rajendra Prasad Etc. Etc vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 9 February, 1979
Equivalent citations
