Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 3692 (0.03 seconds)

Maru Ram And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 11 November, 1980

showered arguments against the privative provision (Section 433A) as constitutional anathema and penological atavism, incompetent for Parliament and violative of fundamental rights and reformatory goals ... resulting in their release in the matter of a few years. The penological sense of Parliament was apparently outraged by such extreme abbreviations of life
Supreme Court of India Cites 39 - Cited by 119 - A D Koshal - Full Document

Shri Pappu Lal Meena vs The Commissioner Of Police on 17 May, 2012

society. This punitive approach, however, represents the earlier stages of development of penology and no longer finds support in modern times. The second reaction treats ... responsible for criminality in the offender. Keeping in view the aforementioned factor, penology may also be approached from various points of view each giving rise
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 96 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Shri Sandeep vs Commissioner Of Police on 13 March, 2013

society. This punitive approach, however, represents the earlier stages of development of penology and no longer finds support in modern times. The second reaction treats ... responsible for criminality in the offender. Keeping in view the aforementioned factor, penology may also be approached from various points of view each giving rise
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 85 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next