fingers.
25. Dr.Shinde further opined on the basis of ossification test that the
victim was more than 21 years old. The medical certificate ... examination of the appellant-accused opined that appellant-accused
was not impotent, not any way helpful to the prosecution in view of
above quality
stating that there is nothing to suggest that he is impotent. The requisition
given by P.W12 was marked ... submitted an
application before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchenthur, to conduct
DNA test to the accused, P.W1 and to the minor child
stating that there is nothing to suggest that he is impotent. The requisition
given by P.W12 was marked ... submitted an
application before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchenthur, to conduct
DNA test to the accused, P.W1 and to the minor child
potency test. After his
examination, he opined that there was nothing that was suggestive that
accused was incapable of sexual intercourse or impotent. He proved
Shri. Mahesha S/O.Shri. Mallikarjuna vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 March, 2014
Muthukani vs State By Inspector Of Police on 23 February, 2016
Crl.A.(MD) No
Kesavan vs The Inspector Of Police on 27 October, 2021
Crl.R.C.No.513
State By Pulakeshinagara vs Khan Sadab @ Sadab Khan on 23 April, 2016
IN THE COURT
State vs . 1. Ram Lal Yadav @ Ram on 4 April, 2013
1
FIR No. 398
State vs . Rajender Gupta on 1 June, 2010
IN THE COURT OF MS. MADHU JAIN
