Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

shall be allowed by the compounding authority where there are apparent contradictions, inconsistencies or incompleteness in the case of the applicant. (5) A copy

trial Court has disbelieved her evidence by picking out inconsistencies and contradictions, which in fact do not exist in her testimony. The learned Addl ... spot of occurrence is doubtful. Her evidence is fraught with inconsistencies and contradictions. In her evidence, she has deviated from the core case

Thus,   there   were   major   discrepancies   in   the   form   of   contradictions, inconsistencies,   omissions,   exaggerations   and   embellishments   not   only regarding the factum of 'date ... nature in   the   testimony   of   the   prosecutrix,   in   the   form   of   contradictions, inconsistencies, omissions, exaggerations and embellishments that shakes her version to lack credence

Jitendra Kushwah vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr on 25 October, 2018 1 CRRFC

Narayan with Ram Singh's gun. There were material contradictions and inconsistencies between these two sets of contradictory evidence produced by prosecution and since ... pointed out by counsel for the appellants that there are material contradictions and inconsistencies between the evidence given by different prosecution witnesses on the material

omission cannot take place of a material omission and, therefore, minor contradictions, inconsistencies or insignificant embellishments do not affect the core of the prosecution case ... truthfulness or creditworthiness of a witness. It is only the serious contradictions and omissions which materially affect the case of the prosecution but not every

evaluating the same, acquitted the accused mainly on the ground of contradictions that had appeared in the prosecution evidence. 5. Aggrieved by the judgment ... into consideration whether the contradictions/ omissions are of such magnitude that they are materially affect the trial. Minor contradictions, inconsistencies, embellishments or improvements on trivial

into consideration whether the contradictions/omissions were of such magnitude so as to materially affect the trial. Minor contradictions, inconsistencies, embellishments or improvements in relation ... justifiable reasons for doing so. Where the omission(s) amount to a contradiction, creating a serious doubt regarding the truthfulness of a witness

acquitted the respondent accused on the ground that there are contradictions and inconsistencies in the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses which raise a doubt ... sleep within minutes.‖ 17. Mr. Katyal submits that the so called inconsistencies and contradictions highlighted by the learned ASJ are neither material, nor relevant

upon the statement of PW-1 Krishan Kumar because of material contradictions and inconsistencies. She stated that if statement of this witness is read ... shaky and could not be taken into consideration because . of inconsistencies and contradictions in their statements. Ms. Tuli strenuously argued that even