occurred on 09.03.1988. The appellant insurance Company challenged the claim petition contending that there was no insurance coverage at the time of the accident ... copies maintained by the insurance company as the original always lies with the owner to whom the insurance coverage is given. If a copy
Insurance Company
through its witnesses. Therefore, the Tribunal presumed that the Insurance
Company has post dated the period of insurance coverage to escape from ... side perused.
10.The prime contention of the appellant/Insurance Company is that, the
insurance coverage of the offending vehicle commenced only from
Insurance in respect of the Vessel M.V. Yak anchored at Tuticorin outer Harbour, when the second defendant accepted and undertook the insurance coverage ... because the plaintiff had approached Oriental Insurance Company prior to taking delivery of the vessel for insurance coverage, and in the absence of rejection
appellant/insurer has proved beyond doubt that there was
no insurance coverage for the vehicle involved in the accident ... time of accident, that the initial burden of proof of the insurance
coverage relating to the vehicle involved in the accident is only
maintained only by the
Insurance Company. It is their bounden duty to verify whether the
offending vehicle had insurance coverage at the time of accident ... 10370 of 2007 that the
Insurance Company came to know that the offending vehicle had
no insurance coverage is not acceptable and at the time
maintained only by the
Insurance Company. It is their bounden duty to verify whether the
offending vehicle had insurance coverage at the time of accident ... 10370 of 2017 that the
Insurance Company came to know that the offending vehicle had
no insurance coverage is not acceptable and at the time
accident happened
on 23.09.2010, but as per Ex.B1, insurance policy, the insurance coverage for the
subject vehicle is only for the period between ... Tribunal ought to have exonerated the Appellant / Insurance
Company from any liability since there was no insurance coverage on the date of the
accident
premium on
20.01.2013, but the Insurance Company issued the policy only on
24.01.2013 and the offending vehicle had insurance coverage from
the date of paying ... argument put forth on the side of the Insurance Company that
there was no insurance coverage on the date of the accident
appreciate that as per the Insurance Policy (marked as Ex.R1), the period of insurance coverage of the Car bearing Registration ... vehicle remitted the premium to the Insurance Company on 20.08.2004. In the proposal form, the period of insurance coverage was from 23.08.2004 to 22.08.2005. Even
from an insurance company or an agent recognized by the
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority established
under the provisions of the Insurance Regulatory and
Development ... months from an
insurance company or an agent recognized by the Insurance
Regulatory and established under the provisions of the Insurance
Regulatory and Development Authority
