observations are relevant:
―9. Usually, the prayer for grant of an interlocutory injunction is at a stage
when the existence of the legal right asserted ... administration of this form of interlocutory remedy which is
both temporary and discretionary. The object of the interlocutory injunction, it is
stated
ignored the settled
principles of law regulating grant or refusal of interlocutory injunction.
22. It was then submitted that upon a bare perusal
ignored the settled
principles of law regulating grant or refusal of interlocutory injunction.
22. It was then submitted that upon a bare perusal
reconstituted by the Deed of
Partnership dated July 18, 2019;
h) Perpetual injunction restraining the first
defendant from in any manner whatsoever,
interfering with ... purposes aforesaid, all necessary
accounts, enquiries and directions;
1) Receiver;
m) Interlocutory Injunction;
n) Attachment;
o) Costs;
p) Further and other reliefs
connection with the
meeting cannot be a ground for which an interlocutory injunction sought
for has to be granted. The plaintiffs are, therefore, not entitled
connection with the
meeting cannot be a ground for which an interlocutory injunction sought
for has to be granted. The plaintiffs are, therefore, not entitled
settled principles
of law regarding grant of or refusal to grant interlocutory injunction. He
submits that, in the facts and circumstances of the present case ... settled
principle of law regulating grant or refusal of the interlocutory injunction.
37. Rahul S Shah (supra) notes that, during the pendency of the suit
settled principles
of law regarding grant of or refusal to grant interlocutory injunction. He
submits that, in the facts and circumstances of the present case ... settled
principle of law regulating grant or refusal of the interlocutory injunction.
37. Rahul S Shah (supra) notes that, during the pendency of the suit
above reliefs claimed in the plaint the instant
interlocutory injunction has been filed after receiving the impugned letter
dated May 19, 2025 Annexure ... page 28 to the petition.
Upon the injunction application being moved, an order of
injunction was passed by the coordinate Bench on June
whereby a Learned Judge of this Court confirmed an
order of interlocutory injunction that had been passed in favour of the
2
plaintiff
