Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2642 (1.13 seconds)

Muniswamappa. M vs Venkatesh. S on 3 October, 2025

with an endorsement "Invalid cheque (SBH)". Therefore, it can be presumed that the cheque in question was invalid on the date of presentation ... invalid cheque, observing that Section 138 explicitly requires the cheque to be valid at the time of presentation, and since the cheque in question
Bangalore District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shyam Kiran vs Smt. R. Chitra on 18 November, 2025

cheque in place of this earlier old cheque. But despite of having such knowledge the complainant has presented said cheque for the second time ... accused asking to present the cheque for second time is very less and knowing that the cheque is invalid the complainant has again presented
Bangalore District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kalavathi vs M.G.Srinivasaiah on 5 March, 2025

clearly held that if the cheque is dishonored for the reason that the cheque is invalid, the offence under Sec.138 does not attract ... Bank of India and as such, the cheque dated 20.09.2021 was dishonoured for the reason cheque invalid. The facts of this case are similar
Bangalore District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anantha.N vs G.S.Suresh Gupta on 26 June, 2025

said cheque came to be dishonored and said cheque belongs to the accused was returned as "Unable to scan cheque as Invalid MICR Code ... said cheque came to be dishonored and said cheque belongs to the accused was returned as "Unable to scan cheque as Invalid MICR Code
Bangalore District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next