acquisition of the
shares, which the assessee replied as 5000 share through IPO
(initial public offer), and balance 5000 shares through splitting of
shares ... preferential allotment or private placement and not
under Initial Public Offer (IPO) of company and balance 5000 by
way of bonus shares. In IPO public
raised by the Revenue is with regard to
allowance of purported non-IPO expenses to the tune ... amount of
Rs.1,47,85,680/- in relation to the IPO undertaken by the assessee during the F.Y.
2006-07. The Company
that no bridge
loan was raised/scheduled to be repaid from the IPO
proceeds.
3. The respondent SEBI conducted an investigation in the
case ... found that the IPO proceeds were not utilized as per
the object in the prospectus. Long term working capital
6
augmentation was not done
written examination for Departmental
promotion to the post of inspector (for short, „IPO‟). She
underwent the requisite departmental training and after
completion of the said ... herein, to give effect of the above promotion to the
post of IPO with effect from 26.02.2008 i.e., the date of the
Page
also made agreement with Dolphin Drilling Ltd. - India Project Office ( DDL -
IPO)(Associate Enterprise) for providing Belford Dolphin drillship on charter hire
basis ... IPO at USD 1,00,000 per day and high level skilled marine and
drilling Crew, as provided to it by DDPPL. During the year
case, the
learned CIT(A) ought to have considered that reimbursement of IPO
expenses in contemplation to sale of shares is an allowable expense ... ought to have considered that the reason behind
reimbursement of IPO expenses of Rs. 50,00,0007- is the adverse market
conditions at the time
came out with an Initial Public Offering (hereinafter referred
to as 'IPO') during the period of 11th July, 2011 to 14th July ... well as the prospectus the appellants
had disclosed nine objects of the IPO on which total
expenses were estimated at Rs.5553.08 lakhs
Accounts Officer' DDA with
an advice to submit a fresh IPO in favour of DDA. It was further informed that his earlier RTI
application ... dated 30.03.2017 submitted by him addressed to the CPIO, DDA with an IPO in favour
of 'Accounts Officer, DDA' was duly accepted
account for depositing RTI fees received from the RTI applicants. All the IPOs
received along with the RTI applications at New Delhi office were always ... appellant/complainant along with the RTI
application dated 08.03.2017 had submitted the IPO favouring 'Accounts officer'
only, he was advised and requested vide
CPIO in rejecting his RTI
application on the pretext that the IPO was not properly addressed, directing
him to send the application fee in favour ... activism, filed a plethora of RTI applications with
AICTE with all the IPOs drawn in favour of "Accounts Officer, All India Council
for Technical
