Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 5818 (2.39 seconds)

St. vs Alok Narang Etc. on 13 January, 2011

dowry. The complainant Richa Narang was entrusted with the dowry articles/istridhan detail mentioned in the complaint and list of dowry articles which were retained ... almirah. She did not make any complaint regarding entrustment of Istridhan or demand of dowry personally. A complaint Ex.PW2/D on which
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

St. vs Alok Narang Etc. on 17 January, 2011

dowry. The complainant Richa Narang was entrusted with the dowry articles/istridhan detail mentioned in the complaint and list of dowry articles which were retained ... almirah. She did not make any complaint regarding entrustment of Istridhan or demand of dowry personally. A complaint Ex.PW2/D on which
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Gyan Chand on 30 August, 2012

demand of dowry. He stated that he has given the Istridhan to his daughter according to his means and capacity. After one year, his daughter ... complainant and her parents. He had not taken any of Istridhan items of complainant in his possession. He was told by complainant that Istridhan items
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Hira Lal & Ors. on 17 January, 2014

society but all of no avail. It is further stated that her Istridhan articles were also not returned back despite specific demands and she made ... 1993. In that meeting apart from reconciliation, her Istridhan was demanded but accused persons declined to return and stated that they would see later
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1. Balbir Singh on 17 September, 2013

accused Sandeep Kumar was obtained. On the identification of the complainant, the Istridhan of the complainant/Shalini was taken into police possession. Statement ... point 'A'. Recovery memo of the goods/part of istridhan from the house of accused Sandeep Ex. PW1/J, bearing her signature
Delhi District Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pushpa vs State on 3 May, 2025

dowry are not specific, whereas complainant/respondent no.2 alleged that all istridhan and jewellery are in the custody of the husband and in-laws ... respondent no.2 is still residing in the matrimonial home and all istridhan and jewellery are lying with the complainant/respondent no.2. Marriage
Delhi District Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Fasiul Husnain on 19 March, 2018

Muslim Rites and Ceremonies   and   her   parents   gifted   her   dowry/istridhan   articles including utensils made of silver and copper, jewelery articles i.e a gold ... directed for registration of FIR. PW1 further deposed that after FIR, some istridhan articles were seized from his home vide
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next