with Section 11 of Indo-Tibetan Border Police
Force Act 1992 (ITBP Act).
WP (C) No. 5250/2018 Page 2 of 19
Signature Not Verified ... also submitted that the
subsequent quashing of proceedings cannot absolve his act of
suppression and concealment. It is also contended that the questions
compulsory retirement under Section
10 of the Indo Tibetan Boarder Police Force Act, 1992 read with
Section 10 and 19 of the Indo Tibetan Boarder ... Act.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without
prejudice to the rights and contentions, since petitioner has continued
to serve in the ITBP
Indo-Tibetan Border Police
Force Act, 1992 read with Rule 19 of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP)
Rules 1994, which empowers Central Government
Kumar Alok vs Anish Dayal Singh Dg Itbp And Ors on 10 July, 2023
Author: Sanjeev Sachdeva
Bench: Sanjeev Sachdeva
$~31
* IN THE HIGH COURT ... 2023
DR KUMAR ALOK ..... Petitioner
versus
ANISH DAYAL SINGH DG ITBP AND ORS ..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Appellant: Mr. Rajesh
Satish Chandra Verma, Ips vs Union Of India & Ors. on 24 May, 2023
Author
Sonu Kumar vs Union Of India And Ors on 13 September, 2023
Author: Sanjeev Sachdeva
Comdt Yatindra Nath Rai vs Union Of India And Ors on 20 November, 2023
Author
Comdt Yatindra Nath Rai vs Union Of India And Ors on 20 November, 2023
Author
Comdt Yatindra Nath Rai vs Union Of India And Ors on 20 November, 2023
Author
Comdt Yatindra Nath Rai vs Union Of India And Ors on 20 November, 2023
Author
