Offence complained of : U/S 4 & 8 of ITP Act
c) Name of complainant : Sh. Farman Ali
d) Name of accused, his : 1). Reshma ... against both the accused
persons.
2. Charge u/s 8 of ITP Act was framed against accused Reshma D/o
Zamil and charge
13311/2011
Offence complained : U/s.5 & 7 of ITP Act .
Plea of Accused : Pleaded not guilty
Final Order : As per final Order
Date ... committed the
offences punishable under Sections 5 and 7 of ITP
Act.
2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that
offences punishable U/s.3, 4, 5
and 7 of ITP Act .
2 C.C. No.11623/2016
2. The brief facts of the prosecution ... offences punishable U/sec.3, 4, 5 and 7 of ITP Act has been taken
offences punishable U/s.3, 4, 5 and 6 of ITP Act .
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are as follows ... offences punishable U/sec.3,
4, 5 and 6 of ITP Act has been taken
offences punishable U/s.3, 4,
5 and 7 of ITP Act .
2 C.C.No.11596/2012
2. The brief facts of the prosecution ... offences punishable U/sec.3, 4, 5 and 7 of ITP Act
has been taken
offences punishable U/s.3, 4
and 5 of ITP Act .
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are as follows:
It is alleged ... offences punishable U/sec.3, 4 and 5 of ITP Act has
been taken as per Sec.190 of Cr.P.C.
5. The charge
offences punishable U/s.3, 4
and 5 of ITP Act .
2 C.C.No.23983/2015
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case ... offences punishable U/sec.3, 4 and 5 of ITP Act
has been taken as per Sec.190 of Cr.P.C.
5. The charge
Kama Market
State Vs. Pappy
U/s 3/5/8 ITP Act
CNR No. DLCT-02-002358/12
JUDGMENT
(a) Sr. No. of the Case ... Marg, Ajmeri Gate, Delhi.
(e) Offence U/s 3/5/8 ITP Act
(f) Plea of accused Pleaded Not guilty
(g) Final Order Acquitted
JUDGE (NDPS)
SHAHDARA DISTRICT, KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI
FIR No. : 254/2015
Under Sections : 376(2)(n) IPC and
6 POCSO Act and 5 ITP Act ... POCSO
Act and 5 ITP Act against the accused and accordingly got the
present case registered. During investigation, IO produced the
prosecutrix before
Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred as " ITP Act ").
2. Briefly stated, it is the case of prosecution that ... person vide order dated 30.05.2011 u/s 3 , 4 & 5 ITP Act
to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
4. During
