Section 2 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
other person who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion unless it is proved that any such person would not have been
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 8428 (4.01 seconds)Section 2 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
which this Act extends who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion, unless it is proved that any such person would
State Of Orissa Through Kumar ... vs Genesh Chandra Jew on 24 March, 2004
State Of Orissa Through Kumar ... vs Genesh Chandra Jew on 24 March, 2004
Equivalent citations: AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT ... State of Orissa Through Kumar Raghvendra Singh & Ors.
RESPONDENT:
Genesh Chandra Jew
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/03/2004
BENCH:
DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT
Section 2 in The Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
other person who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion, unless it is proved that any such person would not have been
Mozelle Robin Solomon vs Lt. Col. R.J. Solomon on 3 February, 1968
according to the Jewish law. In accordance with the custom amongst the Jews the parties executed a writing known as the Kethuba. These documents ... they should obtain a divorce by consent as is permissible amongst the Jews as also coerced her into signing an agreement to that, effect
Section 3 in The Hindu Minority And Guardianship Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
which this Act extends who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion unless it is proved that any such person would
Sri Sri Iswar Gopal Jew And Ors. vs Bhagwandas Shaw on 14 July, 1981
Iswar Gopal Jew And Ors. vs Bhagwandas Shaw on 14 July, 1981
Equivalent citations: AIR1982CAL12, AIR 1982 CALCUTTA 12
JUDGMENT
1. The above suit
Abdul Majid vs Jew Narain Mahto And Ors. on 3 December, 1888
Abdul Majid vs Jew Narain Mahto And Ors. on 3 December, 1888
Equivalent citations: (1889)ILR 16CAL233
JUDGMENT
Mitter and Macpherson, JJ.
1. The plaintiff ... this case brought a suit against Jew Narain Mahto and others for an account in regard to his share in a certain ticca transaction
Kamal V.M. Allaudin And Etc. Etc. vs Raja Shaikh And Etc. Etc. on 7 March, 1990
matrimonial matters arising between parties who are Muslims and parties who are Jews. By and large, matrimonial petitions and suits coming to the Courts pertain ... Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Parsi and Jew communities. Even the Family Courts Act contemplates that personal law of parties will govern them in their respective matrimonial
Jetha Bai & Sons, Jew Town, Cochin, Etc. ... vs Sunderdas Rathenai, Etc. Etc on 4 February, 1988
Jetha Bai & Sons, Jew Town, Cochin, Etc. ... vs Sunderdas Rathenai, Etc. Etc on 4 February, 1988
Equivalent citations ... Author: Sabyasachi Mukharji
Bench: Sabyasachi Mukharji
PETITIONER:
JETHA BAI & SONS, JEW TOWN, COCHIN, ETC. ETC.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
SUNDERDAS RATHENAI, ETC. ETC.
DATE OF JUDGMENT