Suit stating that
it was barred by limitation.
14. Learned JSCC vide Order dated 22.02.2020 observed that it was
clear from the reading ... Appellant preferred a Review Application against
the Order dated 22.02.2020. The learned JSCC while dismissing the
Application observed that the averment of the Plaintiffs
Judge upheld the Judgment and
Decree dated 11.11.2021 passed by the learned JSCC/ASCJ/GJ, decreeing
the Suit for Possession in respect of Quarter
dismissed the
Appeal against Judgment dated 19.04.2017 passed by the learned JSCC-
cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge (South), New Delhi filed by the original
Plaintiff ... thus,
null and void. The Suit was dismissed on 19.04.2017 by Ld. JSCC-cum-
ASCJ-cum Guardian Judge on the ground that the factum
proceedings arising therefrom in terms of the Order dated 11.12.2017 passed
by JSCC on the mutual agreement between the parties.
2. It is submitted that
behalf of the Appellant
against the Judgment dated 06.11.2025 of the learned JSCC/ASCJ/GJ-01
(Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
judgment only in
Execution Petition No. 611/2025 filed before the learned JSCC/ASCJ/GJ,
New Delhi, which was listed for 24.12.2025. Thereafter, the execution
uphold the Order dated 21.12.2024 of learned
Additional Senior Civil Judge-cum-JSCC-cum-GJ, by observing that he has
This is a digitally signed
proceedings arising therefrom in terms of Compromise Deed dated
08.09.2025 passed by JSCC on the mutual agreement between the parties.
2. It is submitted that
Appellant against the Judgment and Order dated 30.10.2025
whereby the learned JSCC/ASCJ-GJ-01, West District, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi in the Regular First
sought setting aside of the
ex parte Judgment.
11. However, the learned JSCC vide the judgment dated 15.03.2024, held
that there were no circumstances proven
