election," the High Court
would in the exercise of judicial restraint, desist from exercising
jurisdiction, This principle of judicial/ jurisdictional restraint,was
propounded ... election. The High Court,
would in the exercise of judicial restraint, relegate such a
petitioner to his remedy of an election petition. This exercise
operation of
law or affects the individual or society. Though judicial restraint,
albeit self-recognised, is the order of the day, yet an
administrative decision ... what
lies outside the power of judicial review is necessary to preserve
the sanctity of judicial power. Judicial power is respected and
adhered
Union of India, (1994) 6 SCC 651] there must be
judicial restraint in interfering with administrative action.
Ordinarily, the soundness of the decision taken ... been taken
appropriately in public interest, the court ordinarily should
exercise judicial restraint. When a decision is taken by the
authority concerned upon due consideration
that the power of judges
must not be unbridled and judicial restraint must be exercised, before using strong
and scathing language to criticize any individual ... this Court, speaking through
Justice K Jagannatha Shetty held:
―13. Judicial restraint and discipline are as necessary to the
orderly administration of justice as they
judicial review. In
paragraph 94 of the said judgment , the following principles were
deduced :
"(1) The modern trend points to judicial restraint in
administrative ... been taken purely on public
interest, the Court ordinarily should exercise judicial
restraint."
31. In M/s. Master Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. Metcalfe
arbitrary in nature.
05. Besides, the Courts are expected to exercise judicial restraint in
interfering with the administrative action, particularly in matter of tender ... evolved the following principles:
1. "The modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action;
2. The Court does not sit as a court
5477/2021
05. Besides, the Courts are expected to exercise judicial restraint in
interfering with the administrative action, particularly in the matter of tender ... evolved the following principles:
1. "The modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action;
2. The Court does not sit as a court
from such process [CIRP] or not", open for subsequent
judicial determination95.
169. Judicial restraint must not only be exercised
while adjudicating upon the constitutionality ... balance of
separation of powers between the legislature and the
judiciary. Judicial restraint must be exercised in such
cases as a matter of prudence, since
M/S Almomin College Of Education, vs The Registrar, on 18 June, 2021
Author: M
judicial review. In
paragraph 94 of the said judgment , the following principles were
deduced :
"(1) The modern trend points to judicial restraint in
administrative ... been taken purely on public
interest, the Court ordinarily should exercise judicial
restraint."
63. In M/s. Master Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. Metcalfe
