klj benchid: s-m-subramaniam

M.Balasubramani vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 21 August, 2019

Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466, learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization is repugnant

Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 33 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

S.Mariappan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Represented By on 25 June, 2019

Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466, learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization is repugnant

Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 1 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

S.Balachandran vs Government Of Tamil Nadu on 5 July, 2019

Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466, learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization is repugnant

Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 2 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

P.Kalimuthu vs The Secretary To Government Of Tamil ... on 19 August, 2019

Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466, learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization is repugnant

Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 2 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

Natarajan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 23 July, 2019

Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466, learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization is repugnant

Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 1 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

M.Ayyappan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 22 August, 2019

Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466, learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization is repugnant

Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 1 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

S.Sundari vs Government Of Tamilnadu on 16 February, 2018

Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466, learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization is repugnant

Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 1 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

P.Thirumoorthy vs The Chief Secretary To Government Of ... on 7 March, 2018

Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466, learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization is repugnant

Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 2 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

Dr.R.Sethu vs The Manonmaniam Sundaranar University on 2 March, 2018

Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466, learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization is repugnant

Madras High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 1 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

B.Murugan vs State Represented By Its Secretary on 28 February, 2018

Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466, learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization is repugnant

Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 2 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results