Pradesh, for
increased pay scales. The Respondents claim the benefits of the Kramonnati
Scheme with effect from 19.4.1999, whereas the Appellants assert that they ... willing to grant the benefit of the Kramonnati Scheme to them, and
obviously others similarly placed as they are, but with effect from
allowed. The petitioners are entitled to
derive the benefit of second Kramonnati
according to the terms and conditions
mentioned in the circular dated ... date 01/08/2003 to grant
the benefit of second Kramonnati to the
teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory,
hence quashed.
(ii) Teachers of Education Department
allowed. The petitioners are entitled to
derive the benefit of second Kramonnati
according to the terms and conditions
mentioned in the circular dated ... date 01/08/2003 to grant
the benefit of second Kramonnati to the
teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory,
hence quashed.
(ii) Teachers of Education Department
allowed. The petitioners are entitled to
derive the benefit of second Kramonnati
according to the terms and conditions
mentioned in the circular dated ... date 01/08/2003 to grant
the benefit of second Kramonnati to the
teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory,
hence quashed.
(ii) Teachers of Education Department
dated 4.2.2004 by which the
petitioner has been granted the benefit of Kramonnati w.e.f. 7.4.2002
to 3.5.2003 only.
It appears that the petitioner ... promotion by the petitioner, impugned order was passed sanctioning
the first Kramonnati in favour of the petitioner w.e.f. 7.4.2002 but
since the petitioner
which has also been affirmed by the
Supreme Court, regarding grant of Kramonnati Vetanman to
the employees working in the Work-charged & Contingency
Paid ... directed to consider
the claim of the petitioners for granting them Kramonnati
Vetanman for the period they have performed their duties in
the Work-charged
allowed. The petitioners are entitled to
derive the benefit of second Kramonnati
according to the terms and conditions
mentioned in the circular dated ... date 01/08/2003 to grant
the benefit of second Kramonnati to the
teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory,
hence quashed.
(ii) Teachers of Education Department
have declined to go on promotion, will not get the benefit of
Kramonnati. It is pointed that the benefit of second Kramonnati was given ... petitioner, the respondents decided to take
away the benefit of Kramonnati.
2. Shri N.S. Ruprah, learned counsel for the petitioner relied on a
judgment
allowed. The petitioners are entitled to
derive the benefit of second Kramonnati
according to the terms and conditions
mentioned in the circular dated ... date 01/08/2003 to grant
the benefit of second Kramonnati to the
teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory,
hence quashed.
(ii) Teachers of Education Department
allowed. The petitioners are entitled to
derive the benefit of second Kramonnati
according to the terms and conditions
mentioned in the circular dated ... date 01/08/2003 to grant
the benefit of second Kramonnati to the
teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory,
hence quashed.
(ii) Teachers of Education Department
