never came in possession over the land. He
also executed a 'LADAVI' in favour of the petitioners on
05.09.2002 stating that the land ... over the land, they made available a copy of the
said 'LADAVI' dated 05.09.2002. The opposite party no. 2 paid
the entire agreed
however, been contended by counsel for the appellants that this being a ladavi deed could not create a title in favour of the plaintiffs ... title in law could be created by a ladavi deed. In support of this contention reliance has been placed by the learned counsel
made Dr. Jai Gopal Lal executed a deed of Ladavi on
26.4.1979 . It is the case of the petitioners that since the
Ladavi was executed ... writ petition. It is next stated that
following the Ladavi executed on 26.4.1979 that the two
petitioners approached the Circle Officer, Sadar Anchal,
Chapra
Bihar. The Collector has based his order on the basis of a
LADAVI executed on 22.09.1992 by Lallan Kumar Singh,
Praveer Kumar, son of Amarnath ... petitioner no. 1, 2 and 3 in
the writ application. This LADAVI was executed in a
Panchayat held in the village, wherein the aforesaid
petitioners
Asharfi.
4. On 21st April, 1935, Asharfi executed a registered deed of Ladavi (deed of relinquishment) in favour of Mahadeo disclaiming her interest ... Mokarrari Heyati deed. There is controversy between the parties regarding this Ladavi deed as well. Defendant No. 2 alleged that this Ladavi deed
properties. However, good sense prevailed, and he
executed a registered deed of ladavi (relinquishment) dated
09.06.1936 (Ext.5) in favour of Moti Mishra, including ... contention that
the said Gokhul Mishra executed the registered deed of ladavi
dated 09-06-1936 (Ext.5) is wrong; in fact, the said ladavi
behalf of the petitioner for getting a document i.e. Ladavi Deed
No. 2317 of 1915, which was produced for getting the same
marked ... witnesses have already stated in respect of
contents disclosed in the said Ladavi, however, due to bona fide
mistake, said document could
properties. On 20th October 1935, Mithila Saran also executed a deed of Ladavi, exhibit 56, relinquishing in favour of defendant properties described in Schedule ... detail to the evidence but merely pointed out that in the Ladavi deed, exhibit 56, Mahanth Mithila Saran had stated that "he had only
here that on 8th Nov., 1968, the defendants second party executed a Ladavi deed in favour of Sagiruddin who was their father. The said Ladavi ... within the meaning of Section 2 (k) of the Act, as the Ladavi deed did not confer any right upon him. It would be relevant
called
admission made by appellants and defendant no.5 in these ladavi
deeds was never confronted to the plaintiff. Moreover, the plaintiff
has not admitted ... well as the appellants
and the defendant no.5 that these ladavi deeds are fraudulent deeds.
The appellants have also filed Title Suit
