relation to a claim that the management had indulged in an illegal lockout, could not be gone into by the court, in judicial review, under ... generally, did not claim that the respondents had indulged in an illegal lockout; therefore, the appropriate government was justified in concluding that there
letter dated 23-1-1985 i.e., such prior to effecting lockout in May 1985. This letter is addressed by the Company to Tata Power ... observed that since separate proceedings were pending in regard to the lockout that was imposed by the company, no opinion was being expressed in regard
June 21, 1992. During the aforesaid period of lockout, it is alleged that some of the workmen were provided with sickness benefits but later ... evident from the application filed is that during the period of lockout from May 7, 1992 to June 21,1992 several workmen were treated
Government of West Bengal prohibiting the continuance of suspension, i.e., lockout in the said unit of the said company, has also been challenged ... created. Under such circumstances, the Management of the petitioner company declared lockout at their unit at 102, Narkeldanga Main Road, Kolkata-700054 with effect from
manifest from the rest of the Act. Chapter-XIV prohibits strikes and lockouts and makes closure of work by employer in certain circumstances illegal ... provides for reference to the Industrial Court for declaration whether strike, lockout, closure or stoppage of work is illegal. Chapter-XV deals with constitution
second respondent and its directors to improve the situation, the frequent strikes, lockouts and suspension of work in the unit and also ... decreased production and reduction in the utilisation of installed capacity. There were lockouts, strikes and suspension of operations for nearly 18 months. This worsened
basis that there was a strike and there was a lockout and it was for the Industrial Tribunal to examine the facts and circumstances leading ... strike and the lockout and to come to a decision as to whether one or the other or both were justified. On the issue
said settlement, it was stated:
"The company has enforced lockout of its
employees on and from 14.1.93 for the reasons
mentioned in the company ... lock out notice dated
28.12.90 and the said lockout is still continuing. In
view of the long duration of the lockout and
protracted court proceedings
reason of civil commotion, local
combination of workmen, strike or lockout,
affecting any of the trades employed on the
work, or
(v) by reason
reason of civil commotion, local combination of workmen, strike or lockout, affecting any of the trades employed on the work, or
(v) by reason
