Thahira vs State Of Kerala
INDENT DT 12-1-2011 IN FORM NO III,ISSUED BY THE
MATSYAFED,KERALAM.
EXHIBIT P24 TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IN FORM NO.57031
Search Results Page
Search Results
181 - 190 of 322 (1.17 seconds)Swastik Filaments Private Limited vs Sri Narayana Industrial Yarns Private ... on 12 October, 2020
yarn manufactured
by the plaintiff is supplied to various industries like MATSYAFED/ KERALA
(Govt. of Kerala undertaking), Khetan Udyog, Baliga fishnets, 100% Export
M/S Sadiq Brothers Marine Works vs Commissioner Of Customs on 28 April, 2008
Kerala State
Co-operative Federation for Fisheries Development Ltd. ('Matsyafed'
for short). Subsequently, Matsyafed invited tenders for the disposal
of the trawlers
Ajith vs State Of Kerala on 1 February, 2005
have given the details of their engagement as Hatchery Workers under the Matsyafed--2nd respondent (hereinafter referred to as Federation), in their various Units
Deepa Radhakrishnan vs The State Of Kerala on 17 March, 2026
2014/F
AND HD DATED 01.08.2014 WHEREBY 113
TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES OF THE MATSYAFED
WERE REGULARIZED IN THE SERVICE OF THE
MATSYAFED
Exhibit P38 TRUE COPY
Sudheesh P.S vs The State Of Kerala on 17 March, 2026
2014/F
AND HD DATED 01.08.2014 WHEREBY 113
TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES OF THE MATSYAFED
WERE REGULARIZED IN THE SERVICE OF THE
MATSYAFED
Exhibit P38 TRUE COPY
Seema Viswanath vs State Of Kerala on 17 March, 2026
2014/F
AND HD DATED 01.08.2014 WHEREBY 113
TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES OF THE MATSYAFED
WERE REGULARIZED IN THE SERVICE OF THE
MATSYAFED
Exhibit P38 TRUE COPY
Chitra R vs State Of Kerala on 17 March, 2026
2014/F
AND HD DATED 01.08.2014 WHEREBY 113
TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES OF THE MATSYAFED
WERE REGULARIZED IN THE SERVICE OF THE
MATSYAFED
Exhibit P38 TRUE COPY
Raveendran K.R vs Union Of India on 12 April, 2023
KERALA - , PIN - 695004
4. KERALA STATE COOPERATIVE FEDERATION FOR FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT LTD
MATSYAFED, KAMALESWARAM, MANACUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-
, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
Pradip Somasundaran vs Institute Of Human Resource ...
admitted fact that the 3rd respondent was on deputation to
the Matsyafed for two years. The specific stipulation in the
Special Rules as to experience