Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 779 (1.01 seconds)

Santhanam Mariyammal vs Felix on 27 September, 2018

plaint. Misrepresentation alone had been pleaded. If the documents had been obtained by misrepresentation, then the documents become voidable documents. Misrepresentation had been defined ... Indian Contract Act, 1872, and it is as follows: ?18."Misrepresentation" defined.-"Misrepresentation" means and includes- (1) the positive assertion
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ravi … vs The State Rep. By on 29 July, 2022

under such misconception. We may also see how free consent has been defined under the Indian Contract Act . Section 14 of the Indian Contract ... defined in section 15 , or (2) undue influence, as defined in section 16 , or (3) fraud, as defined in section 17 , or (4) misrepresentation
Madras High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ravi … vs The State Rep. By on 29 July, 2022

under such misconception. We may also see how free consent has been defined under the Indian Contract Act . Section 14 of the Indian Contract ... defined in section 15 , or (2) undue influence, as defined in section 16 , or (3) fraud, as defined in section 17 , or (4) misrepresentation
Madras High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M.Vijaya vs Dinesh Kumar on 23 February, 2021

omission as the law specially declares to be fraudulent. Misrepresentation is defined under 18 of Indian Contract Act, 872. “Misrepresentation” as follows: “Misrepresentation” means ... that it is void for fraud and misrepresentation. The respondent has failed to prove fraud or misrepresentation. Section 23 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 deals
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - M Sundar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next