police
personnel is that during patrolling, police and its officials
were attacked by the miscreants, who opened fire in
which two police men killed ... implicated due to
village politics. He submits that it was a mob attack and
27 persons have been named and 25 - 30 were unknown
persons
petitioner has been falsely implicated. He submits that there was a
mob attack and general and omnibus allegations have been
levelled against him. He further
gone to measure the land along
with police party, a mob of 1000 persons became violent and
resorted to pelting stones, snatching of police arms ... further submits that it was a mob attack
and no specific allegation has been made against the petitioner.
However, learned APP for the State opposes
learned counsel for the
petitioners that it was a mob attack in which 30 persons have been
named by the police informer and 50 persons ... been committed by the
petitioners, as it was a mob attack and the petitioners could not
have been specifically named to have committed the offence
which he died at the spot
after that mob became aggressive and attacked upon the truck.
However, the informant protected the driver and Khalasi ... brought them in police station and kept them in Hazat
but mob attacked upon the police with a view to kill both Khalasi
Patna High
unnamed accused persons,
hence, it was a mob attack.
However, learned counsel for the informant submits
that petitioner was an accomplice of the other accused
Penal Code are not applicable against him, as there was a
mob attack and the petitioner was not responsible for the
same. He submits that
Transport Corporation and some started
snatching arms of the police force. A mob of about 300 persons
assembled in which 12 persons were named ... submits that it was a mob attack and the
petitioner was just a passer by and has been named only on
suspicion.
However, learned
submitted that after the death of a child in
hospital, a mob attacked on hospital, pelted stones and damaged
the articles. The petitioners are alleged
implicated in the aforesaid case. He submits that it
was the mob attack and the injury cannot be attributed specifically
to the petitioner to have
