respondents herein to
regularly absorb the petitioners herein as Multi Purpose Workers / Multi
Tasking Staff Grade-I for SSLC Qualified and Multi Purpose Workers/Multi ... respondents herein to regularise their services by
observing them as multi purpose workers / multi task staff - Grade I, SSLC
qualified and multi purpose workers / multi
dated
18.01.2016 published by the 1st respondent for recruitment of
Multi Task Hospital Worker for the Primary Health Centers
including the 3rd and 4th respondents ... regularise
the services of the petitioners services as RCH-Aya, Multi Task
Hospital worker or any other equivalent post w.e.f. the date
respondents from in any manner disengaging the petitioners services of Multi task service workers, Data entry operators, Technical Assistants, Stenographer Gr.III, Farm Supervisor, Technical ... salary to the petitioners from 16.02.2016 for their engagement as Multi task service workers, Date entry operators, Technical Assistants, Stenographer-Gr.III, Farm Supervisor, Technical
category, as Multi Tasking Staff are created in the petitioner
administration. Over and above the same, the post of Multi Purpose Worker
has also been
Tiruvannamalai, regarding absorption of the petitioners to the
post of Multipurpose Hospital Workers. It had therefore been stated that
those who have been so regularised ... After having extracted work from them as Multi
Hospital workers over the years, the impugned order has been passed by
reverting them back
M.Velu vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 19 March, 2010
Author: Elipe Dharma
Dindigul Pettai Sathangudi Shatriya vs Selvaraj Sundar on 17 December, 2008
Author: S.Palanivelu
Bench
R.Moorthy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 25 September, 2014
Author: R.Mahadevan
Larsen And Toubra Ltd., Madras And Ors. vs Joint Commercial Tax Officer, Madras ... on 7
Sunitha Venkatram vs Ms.Divya Rayapati on 30 March, 2015
Author: S. Manikumar
Bench: S
