that the
erstwhile ruler in the Nizam State had granted as 'Muntakhab' or 'Inam',
sixty acres of land ... these issues 2 and 3 is that the grant is not
available, Muntakhab is not true and the Inam is not entered
compensa-
tion payable under that Act;]
xxx xxx xxx
(c) “Muntakhabs and Vasiqas” means documents is-
sued by competent authorities as a result of Inam ... means the enjoyment
of the Atiyat grant on the basis of a Muntakhab, a
Vasiqa or any order of a competent authority;
General Provisions
note and approved by him on 22 nd December,
1954. The Muntakhab did not set out the number of Sendhi
(excise) trees on the land ... claimants applied to the Assistant Nazim Atiyat for
amendment of the Muntakhab (for inclusion of Sendhi trees). The
application was rejected. Claimants then approached
order of the District Collector is illegal. He submits that the original Muntakhab in favour of Jamal Shah is not a service inam ... other competent grantor and continued or confirmed by virtue of a muntakhab or other title deed, with or without the condition of service and coupled
also a
Muntakab issued by the erstwhile Nizam Government of
Hyderabad bearing Muntakhab No.4475 dated 24th Ramzan
1326. H. equivalent to 15th Azur ... Under column 10
of the Muntakhab it is ordered that 22 acres and 20 guntas
of inam land, which was under the Dargah Hazrath Syed
order of the Nazim Atiyath Court and that of the Revenue Minister, Muntakhab No.57 of 1955 dated 12-5-1955 was issued ... Sendhi (excise) trees standing on the land shown in the Muntakhab were not included and thereby the claimants were denied their Haq Malikana Rights, they
subject property is Waqf property or not and
the validity/effect of muntakhab relied upon by the Waqf Board and that
the petitioners ... above contention, the petitioners further deny the
authenticity of the muntakhab as filed. It is submitted that only a
photocopy of the alleged document
UNOFFICIAL RESPONDENTS) ............................................................31
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:- ..........................................................................38
MUNTAKHAB:- ..................................................................................................40
EARLIER PROCEEDINGS ... SSLR, Hyderabad with a
request to conduct an enquiry and to implement Muntakhab
No.9 dated 16.10.1950 in terms of orders
UNOFFICIAL RESPONDENTS) ............................................................31
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:- ..........................................................................38
MUNTAKHAB:- ..................................................................................................40
EARLIER PROCEEDINGS ... SSLR, Hyderabad with a
request to conduct an enquiry and to implement Muntakhab
No.9 dated 16.10.1950 in terms of orders
UNOFFICIAL RESPONDENTS) ............................................................31
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:- ..........................................................................38
MUNTAKHAB:- ..................................................................................................40
EARLIER PROCEEDINGS ... SSLR, Hyderabad with a
request to conduct an enquiry and to implement Muntakhab
No.9 dated 16.10.1950 in terms of orders