petitioners, proceeded to pass the order dated 23.10.2007
directing to mutate the name of the 4th respondent in the
khatha of the schedule properties ... short). The Tahasildar
ought not to have mutated the name of the 4th respondent
in khatha of the scheduled properties based on the alleged
Will
respondent -
Tahsildar and issue a writ of mandamus directing the
respondents to mutate the name of the 1st petitioner in
3
respect ... district during the year 1977-78. The Record of Rights
have been mutated in the name of the 1st petitioner from
the date
right
under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act.
Accordingly, the mutation in respect of these lands were
mutated in name ... executant - Dasegowda died on 28.8.1979. The
said mutation has taken place during the life time of the
deceased Dasegowda.
3. It is further case
entered the name of the petitioner in the revenue
records including the mutation register in MR
No.29/2005-06, vide Annexure-E. The petitioner ... saguvali chit. Accordingly, the petitioner's
name was entered in the mutation register and the RTC.
Presumption has to be drawn under Section
issued to the petitioners as per the grant orders and
subsequently, the mutation was effected in the names of
the petitioners in respect of their ... name of the
Government in the relevant column by cancelling the
mutation order made in favour of the petitioners as per
Annexure-K dated
powers under the provisions of Section
114 of the Indian Evidence Act, mutated as per MRF
No.5/1972-73 and also the RTCs ... before
the Assistant Commissioner for entering his name in
the Khatha, Mutation and revenue records. The
6
Assistant Commissioner by the order dated 3.12.2009
dismissed
have filed an appeal in
RA(S)295/2018-19 against the mutation entry made in
M.R.No.2/1974-75 in respect ... Land Revenue Act to
5
stay the further proceedings pursuant to the mutation
orders passed by the jurisdictional Tahsildar raising
various contentions. The present petitioners
Deputy Commissioner by
the orders dated 27.05.2009 and 11.02.2005
respectively, effecting mutation in the name of
respondent No.5 in respect ... said registered sale deeds, the jurisdictional
Tahsildar, by the order dated 25.08.1992 mutated the
name of the petitioner in respect of both the survey
numbers
respondent approached the 3rd respondent to
enter his name in the mutation register in respect of the
said property, on the basis of the forged ... dated 12.02.2018, set-
aside the Order passed by the Tahsildar and the
mutation entry and in M.R.No.3/2001-02 in respect
Commissioner in R.A. (BN) No. 109/2018
consequently the order of mutation in M.R. No. 1/2000 ... gift
deed dated 05.06.1968 executed by one Venkataswamy
Bhovi. Accordingly mutation came to be transferred in the
name of Sri. Yallappa. Sri. Yallappa died intestate
