property in the year 2000 by the respondents
(original petitioners) for mutation entries to be carried out in their names.
Again they have waited ... mutated in the revenue records and thereafter, if
Deepak has expired, the legal heirs of Deepak should have been
mutated in the revenue entries
entered into between petitioner and
respondent No.5 on 10.04.2010. Accordingly,
Mutation Entry No.4277 was made in the revenue
record on 03.05.2010.
2.3 Respondent ... objection. The Mamlatdar, by an
order dated 07.01.2011, quashed the mutation
entry made in respect of the sale transaction in
favour of the petitioner. Aggrieved
claim of
alleged oral partition. He submits that the mutation entry relied upon by the
defendant no.1 does not show oral partition. He submits ... finding of the
first appellate court that many times the mutation entries are not effected though
there is partition of the properties between the parties
claim of
alleged oral partition. He submits that the mutation entry relied upon by the
defendant no.1 does not show oral partition. He submits ... finding of the
first appellate court that many times the mutation entries are not effected though
there is partition of the properties between the parties
claim of
alleged oral partition. He submits that the mutation entry relied upon by the
defendant no.1 does not show oral partition. He submits ... finding of the
first appellate court that many times the mutation entries are not effected though
there is partition of the properties between the parties
death of
the father of the appellant and his brothers, a
mutation entry was made indicating that the
appellant had forgone his right ... respondent No.5 (Exh.35)
Documentary evidences:
1 Exh.57 Mutation entry No.143 dated 15.5.1964
recording names of all five sons as heirs
Mamlatdar and further be pleased
to direct the respondent Mamlatdar to mutate the entry
of lis pendens with respect document registered before
the Sub-Registrar ... competent authority. The petitioner
has approached respondent No.2 for mutating entry of lis
pendence. However, respondent No.2 refused to mutate
the entry
plaintiff filed a suit stating that, under the guise of said
mutation entries the defendants are intending to
transfer the said land. Therefore, the plaintiff ... discloses that the plaintiff has made an
application for change of mutation entry into his name
from the name of his father Gemu. The plaintiff
entries came to be posted. Initially
the petitioners made several oral requests to the
respondents to post the necessary entries. However, as
no entries were ... authorities
are bound, by law, to post and certify the necessary
mutation entries regarding the judgment and decree
passed by the Civil Court as well
party, a lis pendens has
been registered & the disputed entry is mutated
accordingly. Moreover, no interim order has been placed
before only ... specific performance of
oral contract. It appears that inadvertently, the entry was mutated
in the record of rights with regard to grant of injunction
