mutation, whereas in case of disputed mutation,
he is required to refer the matter to the Revenue Assistant.
The application dated 13.02.2009 for mutation ... sanctioning of
mutation, thus, the mutation proceedings remained
undisputed and in case of undisputed mutation Section 23
requires the sanction of the mutation. Furthermore, there
application was dated as 17.10.96. Sh. G.K.Batra passed the mutation order on 2nd October 1996 when the office was closed for a National ... order dated 24.09.96 was implemented at Sl. No.722, the orders dated 24.10.96 were implemented from Sl. No.723 to 727, the order dated
further admitted during general examination that in O-4 register only mutation orders issued by Tehsildar on account of sale, purchase, lease, mortgage, successor ... undisputed cases and in addition, mutation orders issued by SDM/RA in disputed cases are made. On questioning as to whether the orders
Disciplinary Authority under Rule 9 (2-A).
(vii) The impugned orders are non-speaking and the grounds raised by the applicant are neither rebutted ... Additional Collector, in favour of the private party. However, his order of mutation transferring the land from the name of the forest department to that
attorney and special attorney to verify
the truth of transaction and ordered mutation without any
verification.
That the said Sh. Naresh Kumar, N.T. sanctioned ... sanctioning of mutation and thereby
illegal mutation could have been avoided.
That the said Shri Naresh Kumar, N.T. sanctioned mutations
on the basis
delay. There shall be no order as to costs.
2. The Review Applicant has sought review of the aforesaid order on the following main grounds ... mutation order which had been passed by the Petitioner in the year 1996. Shri Rakesh Chopra had challenged the order of mutation passed
mutation, such improper mutation of government property in the name of private person could have been averted. The subsequent cancellation of such improper mutation based ... motive on the part of the applicant in passing the mutation order. Ground Q cites the Apex Courts judgments in Union of India
impugned Suspension Order
dated 11.10.1994 at ANN. A-1, Order at A-2, Inquiry
Report at ANN. A-3, impugned order of penalty ... enquiry was initiated
against the applicant for issuing forged mutation letter without obtaining
the orders from the competent authority with respect to property No.
7442
Naib Tehsildar after hearing the parties on 05.07.1999 passed an order for mutation of 6 bighas and 19 biswa of land in Khasra ... disciplinary proceedings started vide order dated 02.06.2003 in connection with processing case of mutation in respect of land bearing Khasra no.368 measuring 05 bighas
report relating to sale/mutation was prepared by the
applicant at that stage. The documents relating to the sale/mutation
came before the applicant ... High Court, vide order/judgment dated
07.05.2012 (Annexure A/6) upheld the cancellation of mutation
dated 17.12.1998. As such, the objection raised by the applicant
