officer, Chatra in additional charge. In the year
2010, a Mutation application being Mutation Case No. 71/2010-11 has been
preferred ... Circle Inspector, Chatra. Thereafter the
the petitioner has passed the mutation order in Mutation Case No. 71/2020-
11. Thereafter, after five years, the matter
respondents.
2. The petitioner, in this writ application, has challenged the order
dated 29.06.2017 (Annexure-7), passed by Respondent No. 3, whereby
Respondent ... Circle Inspector and the Circle
Officer, they also independently passed the order mutating the land in
favor of Samir Kumar Mahato, but surprisingly, both officers
name was mutated vide Mutation Case No.1795(III) of 2004-2005. He is
paying rent to the State vide mutation order dated 18.03.2005. According
land was sold by virtue of sale
deed and an order for mutating the land, which was in fact non-transferable, was
passed ... granting
NOC and another for passing an order for mutating the land. He also submits
that on the basis of sale deed, the petitioner
Sadar, Medninagar, Palamau, passed in Mutation Appeal
No.XV/2021-22 where through and whereby the Mutation Order passed by
the then Circle Officer, Sadar ... been cancelled.
3. Admittedly, the land has been ordered to be mutated in the
Appeal and in the revision in favour of respondent
respondent No.3-Circle
Officer, Argora, Ranchi has passed an order of mutation. The petitioner is
aggrieved by the said order as according ... That being so, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the mutation order, he
should have approached the Appellate Authority i.e. Land Reforms Deputy
Collector
passed by
respondent No. 4 whereby, he has passed the order of mutation of the land of
Khata No. 3, Plot No. 37, Area ... respondent No. 5.
4. Counsel for the State submits that the order of mutation does not
create any right in favour of respondent
impugned order is at
Annexure-2. From the impugned order, it is clear that the petitioner was
not even made a party in mutation proceeding ... petitioner was not even
heard before the impugned order was passed, which cancelled the
mutation of the petitioner, the impugned order dated
Deputy Commissioner
Giridih in Mutation Case No.20/2012, later
on corrected as Mutation Revision Case
No.20/2012 by Order dated 20.08.2018 by
which ... aforesaid order was challenged before the Deputy
Commissioner, Giridih, who upheld the aforesaid order.
9. In a mutation proceeding, a title is not decided
Circle
Officer, Itkhori (Respondent No.6), District
Chatra to pass appropriate order for mutation of
the land appertaining to Khata No.3, Khewat ... order passed by the Circle Officer, Itkhori which
was allowed vide its order dated 26.11.1998.
3.3. Gulab Ram being aggrieved by the order
