Narco$cs Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances Act, 1985 [ NDPS Act ]and
S. 25-A of Arms ... Agarwal v. Union of India , decided on 25th October, 2021.
38. In Narco$cs Control Bureau v Kishan Lal , 1991 (1) SCC 705, Supreme Court
dated 3/23/2021
Sr. No. 238ZZC
Common Name
(Name of Narco c Drug and
Psychotropic Substance E zolam
(Interna onal non-proprietary
name ... dated 3/23/2021
Sr. No. 110ZN
Common Name
(Name of Narco c Drug and
Psychotropic Substance E zolam
(Interna onal non-proprietary
name
offences punishable under Sec ons 21(c) and 29 of the
Narco c Durgs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985. The
allega on is that ... cough containing a total of 10,000 ml. Of codeine
phosphate narco c substance. It further syrup, which is
no fied as a narco
offences punishable under Sec ons 21(c) and 29 of the
Narco c Durgs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985. The
allega on is that ... cough containing a total of 10,000 ml. Of codeine
phosphate narco c substance. It further syrup, which is
no fied as a narco
cough containing a total of 10,000 ml. Of codeine
phosphate narco c substance. It further syrup, which is
no fied as a narco ... According to learned counsel appearing on behalf of
respondent State, the narco c substance allegedly recovered
from the pe oner's possession
offences punishable under Sec ons 21(c) and 29 of the
Narco c Durgs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985. The
allega on is that ... cough containing a total of 10,000 ml. Of codeine
phosphate narco c substance. It further syrup, which is
no fied as a narco
offences punishable under Sec ons 21(c) and 29 of the
Narco c Durgs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985. The
allega on is that ... cough containing a total of 10,000 ml. Of codeine
phosphate narco c substance. It further syrup, which is
no fied as a narco
Siwani, Bhiwani
2. 55 10.07.2022 8, 15, 18, 21, 25, 29 Narco cs Control
and 60 of NDPS Act Burearu, Chandigarh
3. The facts ... being taken from the complaint as well as reply
filed by the Narco cs Control Bureau (for short 'NCB') to the present
Section
45 of the Evidence Act, to subject PW1 to PW3 to Narco
Analysis Test or Polygraph Test, to prove the defense case. The
petitioner ... direct PW1 to PW3 (the defacto complainant and her parents)
to undergo Narco Analysis Test or Polygraph Test to prove his
innocence, contending that
Dr. Rajesh Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 20 September
