aforesaid institute. It is also submitted that there is no negative parity under the Constitution of India. If the benefit/advantage has been conferred ... misconceived.
51. It is further submitted that the principle of negative parity relied on by opposite party no. 3/respondent univrsity has no application
Officers. Counsel submits that the
petitioner cannot be allowed to claim negative parity on the
ground that she was simply a co-signatory ... authorities, the petitioner cannot be allowed to claim negative
parity. Lastly, he argued that the petitioner is not only a signatory
but also
Officers. Counsel submits that the
petitioner cannot be allowed to claim negative parity on the
ground that she was simply a co-signatory ... authorities, the petitioner cannot be allowed to claim negative
parity. Lastly, he argued that the petitioner is not only a signatory
but also
Officers. Counsel submits that the
petitioner cannot be allowed to claim negative parity on the
ground that she was simply a co-signatory ... authorities, the petitioner cannot be allowed to claim negative
parity. Lastly, he argued that the petitioner is not only a signatory
but also
which run
contrary to the eligibility condition and statutory rules. No negative
parity can be claimed. Reliance is placed on ( 1996) 2 SCC 258
[ Union ... that
negative equality cannot be claimed by a similarly situated person. The
petitioners are unable to show that the persons with whom parity is
claimed
employees now stands adjusted. It
is well settled that negative parity cannot be claimed. Ground of
discrimination cannot be urged citing wrong orders passed
Court, in para 8 of the Judgment, rejected claim of pay parity, between employees of Jal Nigam and Jal Sansthan, on the ground of qualitative ... principle of equal pay for equal work and the Court negated parity, observing that different pay scale prescribed taking into account hierarchy in service
Court, in para 8 of the Judgment, rejected the claim of pay parity, between employees of Jal Nigam and Jal Sansthan, on the ground ... principle of equal pay for equal work and the Court negated parity, observing that different pay scale prescribed taking into account hierarchy in service
Court. This Court is conscious of
the fact that the negative parity does not apply, but at the
same time, judicial discipline requires that while
2022 20:02:55 :::CIS
10
on the ground of negative parity. When the petitioner
admittedly did not fulfill the qualification criteria required
.
for appointment
