Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Swati Maliwal vs State on 20 September, 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT

Sarika Chaudhary & Anr. vs State on 20 September, 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF

could not be on merit alone and therefore the selection process smacked nepotism and favouritism. However, in our opinion such cases can easily be identified ... number of vacancies as well as on the further charge of nepotism. In the latter case, the CAT directed a different approach, keeping in line

reason? (5) Whether the selections were vitiated by bias, favoritism or nepotism? (6) What relief? RE: Question NO.1 - ADVERTISEMENT: (10) Mr. Gupta contended that ... officials of the Corporation and not a single instance of personal favoritism, nepotism or bias is attributed to any one of them. Only vague allegation

their joining in the Press. (xiv) Prima facie the allegation of favouritism/nepotism appears to be sustainable. However, based on the documents and evidence available ... existing employees of Press which could not be on merit alone and nepotism and favouritism cannot be ruled out. (g) Appointments were made without

fair and equitable manner and the element of favouritism or nepotism shall not influence the exercise of discretion, if any, conferred upon the particular functionary ... treated as arbitrary, discriminatory and an act of favouritism and/or nepotism violating the soul of the equality clause embodied in Article

their joining in the Press. (xiv) Prima facie the allegation of favouritism/nepotism appears to be sustainable. However, based on the documents and evidence available ... 1989/2014 and 4952/2014) did not disclose infirmities, such as nepotism and more recruitment than the number of vacancies available, the CAT should

that the selection made by the respondent was based on manipulation and nepotism. According to the petitioner, the criteria adopted by the Selection ... made by the Selection Committee is vitiated by mala fides, favoritism and nepotism and has violated the fundamental right of the petitioner for a fair

also extends to misuse of political power for private gain, such as, nepotism, misappropriation, illegal appropriation of public resources and patronage which is often

Raksha Jindal vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 5 March, 2015 Author: Siddharth Mridul Bench