Sandhya Nitin Pradhan vs National Council Of Science Museums.( ... on 18 January, 2024
Author: Heeralal Samariya
Bench: Heeralal Samariya
के न्द्रीयसूचनाआयोग
Central Information Commission
बाबागंगनाथमागग ... संख्या / Second Appeal No. CIC/NCSBI/A/2022/138502
Smt. Sandhya Nitin Pradhan ... अपीलकताग/Appellant
VERSUS/बनाम
PIO, Nehru Science Museum, National Council of ...प्रनतवािीगण
Sujal Nitin Pradhan vs Ministry Of Communications And ... on 13 March, 2013
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Club Building (Near Post Office)
Old JNU Campus, New Delhi ... March 2013
Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal
Appellant : Mrs. Sujal Nitin Pradhan
20 Sahawas, Kashinath Dhuru Road,
Dadar, Mumbai- 400028
Respondent 1- CPIO
order. The petition herein was opposed by the learned counsel Shri Nitin Pradhan and Shri Subhash Zha, advocates appearing for the representatives of some victims ... merits of the matter, a preliminary objection as raised by Shri Nitin Pradhan has to be dealt with and decided. The objection is that
Appeal No.1226 of 2005.
Mr. Nitin Pradhan, i/by Ms. S.D. Khot and Ms. Ameeta
Kuttikrishnan, for the Appellant/Original Accused ... learned counsel for Accused Nos.6 and 8 by,
by Mr. Nitin Pradhan, learned counsel for Accused No.13, and by
Mr. Mundargi, learned counsel
Appeal No.1226 of 2005.
Mr. Nitin Pradhan, i/by Ms. S.D. Khot and Ms. Ameeta
Kuttikrishnan, for the Appellant/Original Accused ... learned counsel for Accused Nos.6 and 8 by,
by Mr. Nitin Pradhan, learned counsel for Accused No.13, and by
Mr. Mundargi, learned counsel
Appeal No.1226 of 2005.
Mr. Nitin Pradhan, i/by Ms. S.D. Khot and Ms. Ameeta
Kuttikrishnan, for the Appellant/Original Accused ... learned counsel for Accused Nos.6 and 8 by,
by Mr. Nitin Pradhan, learned counsel for Accused No.13, and by
Mr. Mundargi, learned counsel
Appeal No.1226 of 2005.
Mr. Nitin Pradhan, i/by Ms. S.D. Khot and Ms. Ameeta
Kuttikrishnan, for the Appellant/Original Accused ... learned counsel for Accused Nos.6 and 8 by,
by Mr. Nitin Pradhan, learned counsel for Accused No.13, and by
Mr. Mundargi, learned counsel
Criminal Revision Application No. 418 of 1982. We have heard Mr. Nitin Pradhan, advocate for respondents Basappa Umanna Birajdar, Appasaheb Chintamani Patil and Umanna Hingappa ... served but they have not chosen to engage any Counsel. Mr. Nitin Pradhan pointed out that his oral instructions were that Ramkrishna Birajdar is dead
complamant has
lodged this impugned complaint at the behest of one Nitin Pradhan
who happens to be the lawyer of the present complainant. The said ... Nitin Pradhan on many occasion has out of prejudice and mala fide
intentions made many allegations against the applicant without any
sufficient proof. That
State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT
Mr. Nitin Pradhan, Advocate, holding for
Mr. A.H. Kapadia, Advocate for the Appellant
Mr. S.D. Ghayal ... accused, as
referred above. Hence, these appeals.
6. Mr. Nitin Pradhan, learned counsel for
accused Kailash has taken us through evidence on
record. He argued
